From: rrufiange@cfl.rr.com   
      
   "MyWingsofanangel"  wrote in message   
   news:20031126020933.16299.00000743@mb-m23.aol.com...   
   > Only "obsolete" to the ignorant, lazy and mindless IMHO   
   >   
   > I was told, and I believe.....when you find your "Constitutional Rights"   
   are   
   > being ignored or violated, it is up to YOU to rebuild your wall of   
   protection.   
   > Don't expect others to come to your aid if you remain silent on "roll   
   over" and   
   > "cop a plea".   
      
   I can't hardly tell what the Constitution said much anymore.  So much of our   
   heritage is already being altered as we speak.  New pledge of allegiance,   
   new patriotic song wordings, new laws being written to counter the   
   originals....   
      
   > When I read that 70 percent of Americans believe Saddam was behind the WTC   
   and   
   > Pentagon attacks INSTEAD of Osama Bin Laden,,,when I read that our history   
   > shows 70 percent were content to be ruled by England when others put   
   themslves   
   > on the line...it is THEN I recognize the wisdom of "checks and balances"   
   and   
   > the danger of "majority rule" in a "democracy" as opposed to OUR Republic.   
   In   
   > this pluralistic America we have the built in protection of the minority   
   ONLY   
   > IF THEY raise their voice.   
      
   We WON'T know who is responsible for the WTC attacks until someone is   
   convicted of it.  Saddam is a stooge, Bin Laden was the "immediate" prime   
   suspect in Oklahoma City,   
   EVEN with surveillance teams knowing full well who did it.  It was the CIA   
   who said it then, too.  Until 9/11, Bin Laden was a paper threat.  His   
   suspected and proven actions were conducted overseas.  Before 9/11, the   
   average citizen had never heard of him, or al Qaeda.  The attacks of al   
   Qaeda were basic, mostly unimaginative strikes against remote, minimally   
   defended outposts of the U.S. Government (such as embassies).  If Bin   
   Laden's organization was indeed behind this, they'd have to make a QUANTUM   
   LEAP in technological and planning resources even to organize the attack.   
      
   No one, under U.S. law, committed the crime, until convicted.  Sending   
   troops to kill a suspect doesn't make that suspect guilty of any crime.   
      
   (NOTE - I am NOT a conspiracy theorist.  I personally have no clue who did   
   what.  I am only pointing out certain facts, and how easy it might be to use   
   a "paper" terrorist and turn them into a prime suspect, given sufficient   
   motive.)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)