XPost: alt.activism.death-penalty, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   From: DEMI_GOD_@SHAW.CA   
      
   "John wardle"  wrote in message   
   news:UTexb.117461$Ec1.5069117@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > I wondered why freedom of the press,religion, assembly and the right to   
   keep   
   > and bear arms wasn't there.....   
   >   
   BECAUSE the right to beat a firearm is quite insignificant in context of the   
   UDHR, especially on the background of the article compels every individual   
   to themselves from all types of harm, which may consist of use of weapon of   
   some sort, including a firearm.   
      
   But the firearm is extremely dangerous and damaging to its user as it can   
   destroy a life of a person, for which a shooter will become a criminally   
   responsible.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)