XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: pxhxz@cadence.com   
      
   In article  "Scout"   
    writes:   
   >"ulTRAX"  wrote in message   
   >news:3513d8b1.0311261528.1c204e51@posting.google.com...   
      
   >> WTF does your example have to do with anything? Election 2000 is OVER.   
   >> The loser took the prize because the anti-democratic rules were rigged   
   >> in his favor.   
      
   >Translation: The laws were followed and the proper person won under the law.   
      
   No, I disagree with the first.  I believe that by law the U.S. Supreme Court   
   did not have jurisdiction in this case and should have let the State of   
   Florida Supreme Court ruling stand.   
      
   However, Bush would still have won the presidency in that case.   
      
   -Pete Zakel   
    (phz@seeheader.nospam)   
      
   "But what we need to know is, do people want nasally-insertable computers?"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)