XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: DEMI_GOD_@SHAW.CA   
      
   "Eric Johnson"  wrote in message   
   news:BBEE760D.38A35%erj66@xs4all.nl...   
   > On 29-11-2003 14:27, in article   
   j91yb.130074$1N3.74162@twister.nyroc.rr.com,   
   > "David Lentz"  wrote:   
   >   
   > >   
   > > I accept as valid the idea of a tyranny of the majority.  Yet in   
   > > contemporary politics the more likely problem is the tyranny of a   
   > > small but bitter minority.  Just because an idea is supported by   
   > > fifty one percent of the population does not make it wrong.   
   > >   
   > > A majority does have the limited right to govern.  A minority   
   > > never does.   
   >   
   > But neither have the moral justification for enslaving the other. Thus the   
   > House, Senate, and Electoral College.   
   >   
   Unfortunately, many forms of slavery are being perpetuated and practiced   
   extensively by americunts.  Otherwise there wouldn't have been a need of the   
   slavery and genocide....   
      
   Why do you think the "validation" of thirteenth amendments is always being   
   passed, along with exercising of unfair exploitation of slave labor of   
   prisoners by institutions of the incarceration industry, as well as   
   sweatshops' presence is being constantly condoned by the government?   
      
   Your assertion could have some grounds, EJ, but only on condition of absence   
   of the tools of slavery and oppression.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)