XPost: alt.activism.death-penalty, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   From: abcxyz@zbqytr.ykq   
      
   On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 02:38:54 GMT, "Critter"  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"A Planet Visitor"  wrote in message   
   >news:qk7fsvc9l521kpa6co3lpje5n46jpvqj49@4ax.com...   
   >> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:57:39 GMT, "Critter"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> Because you have an inalienable right doesn't mean you cannot lose   
   >them.   
   >> >>   The word 'inalienable' simply means something which cannot be   
   >> >> transferred to another.  If your willful acts deprive others of their   
   >> >> rights, YOU can lose yours.  Rights are not absolute, but conditional   
   >> >> according to the rules governing any particular society.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >Thats not what it means jackoff - it means that you "cannot be separated   
   >> >from".   
   >> >   
   >> Ohhh... Critter has an inalienable right to be ignorant.   
   >   
   >   
   >Correct, but I have yet to exercise that one.   
   >   
   No one believes you, critter.  As with Desmond... you simply claim that you   
   haven't 'exercised it.'  But the fact is... your ignorance muscle exceeds that   
   of Arnold's pecs in his prime.   
      
   PV   
   http://home.earthlink.net/~onetimeuse/desmond_gimmick_index.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)