XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: spam@hotmail.com   
      
   Don Swayser wrote:   
   > under_the_bridge wrote:   
   >   
   >> golddodgearies@yahoo.com (golddodgearies) wrote   
   >>   
   >>> supertroll47@xmsg.com (under_the_bridge) wrote   
   >>>   
   >>>> My recomendation is to have abortions within the   
   >>>> first three months of pregnancy.   
   >>>   
   >>> Doesn't prove it's not murder, dum-dum. (The parents   
   >>> prove it is.)   
   >>   
   >> It doesn't prove anything.  That was just my   
   >> recommendation.   
   >>   
   >> Is it a greater sin to abort an unwanted fetus, or to   
   >> have an unwanted child which you may not financially   
   >> and personally be able to care for?   
   >   
   > Unwanted by whom. There's a long waiting lists for   
   > adoptions.   
      
   Where? In California most adoptions are coming from overseas.   
      
   >> Since the question is partially concerned with the will   
   >>  of the fetus, it is close to unanswerable.  What does   
   >> the baby want?  A similar question is one of   
   >> euthanasia.  Should we kill poor people if their lives   
   >> are miserable?   
   >   
   > Seems two entirely different situations. If a chile[sic]   
   > is unwanted it should be surrendered for adoption....   
      
   How are you going to adopt over a million babies a year?   
      
   >> We are free to make choices.  Should murder be legal?   
   >> The death penalty is.  The fetus, if it feels itself to   
   >>  be murdered, simply has no recourse.  But then,   
   >> killing a killer is not much recourse in my opinion.   
   >> Two wrongs do not make a right.  All you do when you   
   >> "punish" someone is destroy not one, but two people.   
   >   
   > Falacious[sic] premise and conclusion drawn from it. You   
   > (society) don't destroy two people. The killer has   
   > destroyed one. Destroying the destroyer prevent him or   
   > her from destroying another human life. That's the   
   > principal justification for the death penalty.   
      
   No, it isn't. Revenge is the main goal of capital punishment.   
      
   > Another is deterence[sic]....   
      
   It isn't a deterrent.   
   --   
   David V.   
   Yosemite Llama Ranch   
      
   UDP for WebTV   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)