XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: swayser@optonline.net   
      
   David V. wrote:   
      
   > Mjkenoyer wrote:   
   >   
   >> See this is what continues to bewilder me about the   
   >> pro-choice argument....   
   >   
   >   
   > What's so bewildering about a woman controlling what goes on   
   > inside her own body?   
   >   
   It's not so much what is going on inside her body. It's what she's doing   
   to someone elses body. We condone killing people for three reasons in   
   this society. Self defense, war and the death penalty. If a womans   
   continued physical existence is threatened by the pregnancy, fine,   
   abortion is, under those circumstances, self defense. But we do not   
   condone the destruction of a human life for convenience sake. Euthenasia   
   is the logical next step. Why not? They can't kill you by defending   
   themselves. They'd be easy prey also.   
      
      
   --   
   If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an   
   equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors. There is no other.   
   Carl Schurz (1829-1906)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)