XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: rrufiange@cfl.rr.com   
      
   "David V."  wrote in message   
   news:UrKdnYWHtNnzdVGi4p2dnA@sti.net...   
   > > Perhaps you'd be good enough to explain just what isn't   
   > > true.   
   >   
   > Trying to explain something like that to someone like you   
   > would be a waste of time. You already know your statement   
   > was false, yet you persist.   
      
   When you go calling someone a liar, and that someone dares you to prove them   
   a liar, and you subsequently pull a chump-ass excuse such as the above, it   
   makes you appear to be less than stable.   
      
   Back up your statements with honesty, or go the fuck home, bunky.   
      
   > > Your post implies first that American girls aren't   
   > > getting abortions   
   >   
   > There is no such implication, but you already knew that.   
      
   How in the hell would anyone other than you know what you imply in your   
   statements?   
      
   > > You're the one who stated thatthere are not enough   
   > > children available in this country to meet the demand for   
   > > adoption.   
   >   
   > No I didn't, but you already knew that.   
      
   If you really didn't, why bother defending what someone could clearly read,   
   or not read, for themselves?   
      
   > > Non-repsonsive aren't you?   
   >   
   > No, you just don't like my responses.   
      
   Again, the commentary we'd expect of a child.   
      
   > > The U.S. mrder rate is lower than at any time since the   
   > > death penalty was banned.   
   >   
   > Sure, but take the rest of society into consideration and   
   > the connection disapears.   
      
   Take what exactly into consideration?  Be more specific if you expect us to   
   take you seriously.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)