XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: spam@hotmail.com   
      
   Chris wrote:   
   > "David V."  wrote   
   >   
   >>> Perhaps you'd be good enough to explain just what   
   >>> isn't true.   
   >>   
   >> Trying to explain something like that to someone like   
   >> you would be a waste of time. You already know your   
   >> statement was false, yet you persist.   
   >   
   > When you go calling someone a liar...   
      
   They more often are a liar than not.   
      
   >>> Your post implies first that American girls aren't   
   >>> getting abortions   
   >>   
   >> There is no such implication, but you already knew   
   >> that.   
   >   
   > How in the hell would anyone other than you know what you   
   > imply in your statements?   
      
   No need to 'imply' anything. Just read.   
      
   >>> You're the one who stated that there are not enough   
   >>> children available in this country to meet the demand   
   >>> for adoption.   
   >>   
   >> No I didn't, but you already knew that.   
   >   
   > If you really didn't   
      
   I didn't.   
      
   >>> Non-repsonsive[sic] aren't you?   
   >>   
   >> No, you just don't like my responses.   
   >   
   > Again, the commentary we'd expect of a child.   
      
   If you're going to flame, you need to do better than that.   
      
   >>> The U.S. mrder rate is lower than at any time since   
   >>> the death penalty was banned.   
   >>   
   >> Sure, but take the rest of society into consideration   
   >> and the connection disappears.   
   >   
   > Take what exactly into consideration?   
      
   Reality.   
   --   
   David V.   
   Yosemite Llama Ranch   
      
   UDP for WebTV   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)