XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: swayser@optonline.net   
      
   David V. wrote:   
      
   > Chris wrote:   
   >   
   >> "David V."  wrote   
   >>   
   >>>>> Which simply is not true. Why do you have to lie   
   >>>>> like that to support your argument?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Has to be a lie, right?   
   >>>   
   >>> No, she doesn't have to lie. That's my point.   
   >>   
   >> Why is it that when someone makes a statement you   
   >> disagree with, you call it a lie?   
   >   
   > It doesn't matter if I agree or not, a lie is a lie. If a person makes a   
   > statement based on false premises, it's a lie. You've done it several   
   > times.   
   >   
   A lie has to be a statement made with the purpose of deception. Look it   
   up in a dictionary if you don't believe me. It would seem that you're   
   not only a liar, you're an ignorant liar at that.   
      
      
      
   --   
   If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an   
   equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors. There is no other.   
   Carl Schurz (1829-1906)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)