XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: swayser@optonline.net   
      
   David V. wrote:   
      
   > Don Swayser wrote:   
   >   
   >> David V. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Marie A. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> ... When we don't execute those who have willfully   
   >>>> and premeditatedly taken the life of another, as a society we make a   
   >>>> statement that we value the   
   >>>> murderer's life more than that of his/her victim[s].   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Which simply is not true. Why do you have to lie like   
   >>> that to support your argument?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Has to be a lie, right?   
   >   
   >   
   > No, she doesn't have to lie. That's my point.   
   >   
   Why did you cut the rest of my statement. See what I mean about liars?   
   Yor reply is a lie of omission. Here's the rest.   
      
   He can't be just wrong. Liars are those who are quickest to project   
   their own motives on others.   
      
   Youre assuming she isn't just old fashioned mistaken Because you   
   habitually lie you assume others do so also.   
      
      
   --   
   If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an   
   equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors. There is no other.   
   Carl Schurz (1829-1906)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)