XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: swayser@optonline.net   
      
   Your demand is childish. I cannot back up someone else's statement since   
   I don't know the reasoning why she made it. You really aren't very   
   mentall facile, are you?   
      
   David V. wrote:   
   > Don Swayser wrote:   
   >   
   >> David V. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Don Swayser wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> David V. wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Marie A. wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> ... When we don't execute those who have   
   >>>>>> willfully and premeditatedly taken the life of   
   >>>>>> another, as a society we make a statement that we   
   >>>>>> value the murderer's life more than that of   
   >>>>>> his/her victim[s].   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Which simply is not true. Why do you have to lie   
   >>>>> like that to support your argument?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Has to be a lie, right?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> No, she doesn't have to lie. That's my point.   
   >>>   
   >> Why did you cut the rest of my statement.   
   >   
   >   
   > I wasn't interested in it. You haven't bothered to back up the blanket   
   > statement that Marie A. made above. That's what I want to hear about.   
   >   
      
      
   --   
   If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an   
   equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors. There is no other.   
   Carl Schurz (1829-1906)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)