home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.prisons      Not always a Johnny Cash song      3,649 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,703 of 3,649   
   Don Swayser to David V.   
   Re: Abortion   
   04 Dec 03 19:29:40   
   
   XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: swayser@optonline.net   
      
   Every creature possesses a set of chromosones in each cell in every   
   stage of its life, even in-utero. Examinging a set from an unborn will   
   conclusively prove what species to which that organism belongs. An   
   examination of a cell from a one day old fetus will definetly prove that   
   that organism is of the same species of you (maybe) or I. The species is   
   homo-sapiens. Now, here is a dictionary definition of homo-sapiens.   
      
   Homo sapiens: Noun   
      
   1. The only surviving hominid; species to which modern man belongs;   
   bipedal primate having language and ability to make and use complex   
   tools; brain 1400 cc   
      
   There it is, in black and white. A fetus is a human being. Now, let us   
   look up person.   
      
   Person: Noum   
      
   1. A human being   
      
   Again, a fetuse is a person. Period. Now, there it is. An   
   incontravertable fact which demonstrates that you're totally wrong. Now,   
   I'll make a prediction about how you answer this.   
      
   1. You'll ignore it.   
   2. You'll answer, again, with a no responsive non-sequitor.   
   3. You'll try to change the subject.   
   4. You'll complain about top posters.   
      
      
   David V. wrote:   
   > Chas wrote:   
   >   
   >> "Ivan Gowch"  wrote   
   >>   
   >>> Human life is cheap.  There are six billion homo sapiens out there,   
   >>> and many of them will starve to   
   >>> death or die of AIDS before the year is out.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Well; that's reasoning that I can understand. The quarrel   
   >> with abortionists logic is that it won't take the   
   >> responsibility for ending a human life.   
   >   
   >   
   > It's ending a POTENTIAL human life. That potential cannot override the   
   > immutable right a woman has over control over her own body.   
      
      
   --   
   If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an   
   equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors. There is no other.   
   Carl Schurz (1829-1906)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca