XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime
XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism
From: spam@hotmail.com
Moorehead Johnson wrote:
> "Chris" wrote
>
>> "Moorehead Johnson"
>> wrote
>>
>>> For the record, I do support abortions in cases of
>>> incest, rape, life of the mother issues, or in cases
>>> where the baby would be born dead, etc. I don't
>>> support abortions for birth control purposes, which
>>> are the reasons for the majority of abortions in the
>>> US today. I also support the use of 'morning after'
>>> pills and anything else that might be used afterward
>>> to prevent fertilization...but once a woman is
>>> pregant, that is a human life she is carrying. I
>>> think human life trumps a womans desire to avoid the
>>> consequences of her (and the father's) actions.
>>
>> I feel that it is entirely up to the woman. I'd rather
>> we as society weren't sending the message to people
>> that abortion is another means of birth control, but I
>> suppose putting morals into their heads will suffice.
>> The woman has the right to abort her child, up until a
>> point. That's the law. After a certain formative
>> period, the fetus is considered a human life as
>> recognized nation-wide by law.
>
> Not true - late term abortions are perfectly legal in
> this country, so long as the doctor deems it necessary
> for "medical reasons"....
What the probirthers always forget to tell you is that the
vast majority of late term abortions are done on already
dead "babies". These have died of natural causes. The rest
are anencephalic and would not have lived for more than a
few hours after birth.
--
David V.
Yosemite Llama Ranch
UDP for WebTV
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
