XPost: alt.thebird.copwatch, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: alt.california, nyc.general   
   From: pickins486@nyc.rr.com   
      
   Phil wrote:   
   >   
   > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 06:07:01 -0700, "Chas"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > >Phil wrote:   
   > >> Yeah, think of the lives that would be lost at the hands of criminals   
   > >> who could decide when the police would call off pursuits.   
   > >   
   > >As in 'none'?   
   > >What makes you think that criminals  would kill people when police call off   
   > >high speed chases- particularly when they haven't witnessed anything but a   
   > >stop sign violation?   
   >   
   > I'm referring to those who have killed and are racing away.  If the   
   > cop sees him missing a stop sign but says, "He's going too fast for a   
   > traffic stop.  I'll just ignore him,' then a killer could get away.   
      
   We are not "referring to those who have killed and are racing away."   
      
   But YOU insist that since ANY law was broken, the cops MUST assume   
   the WORST and get their man at any cost because once the law is broken....   
   ...someone has to pay! Right Phil?   
      
   > If you think I'm blowing things out of proportion with this scenario,   
   > replace killer with a drunk driver.   
      
   Woooooooooooooooo!!!!!!! Phil used the "D" word!   
      
   You know Phil, I am beginning to think you created the "mike"   
   character yourself so you couls have a foil for your routines!   
      
   --   
   "Bubba got a blowjob, BU$H fucked us all!" - Slim   
      
   George "The AWOL President" Bush: http://awol.gq.nu/4dawol.htm   
      
   WHY IRAQ?: http://www.angelfire.com/creep/gwbush/remindus.html   
      
   VOTE HIM OUT! November 4, 2004   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)