XPost: alt.thebird.copwatch, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: alt.california, nyc.general   
   From: pickins486@nyc.rr.com   
      
   Phil wrote:   
   >   
   > On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:09:25 GMT, slim  wrote:   
   >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >Chas wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> "LaW Man"  wrote   
   > >> > The point is that no matter what the police do, whether it be chase or   
   not   
   > >> > chase, we will always be second guessed, and placed under a microscope,   
   > >> and   
   > >> > studied for days and weeks after the incident.   
   > >>   
   > >> Absolutely.   
   > >> Any time a citizen gets killed, there should be an investigation, and any   
   > >> negligence or unprofessional behaviour sanctioned.   
   > >> Or perhaps you think that police are above the law and anything they do is   
   > >> ok with you?   
   > >>   
   > >   
   > >Phil agrees with loonman mike! "Someone has to pay!"   
   >   
   > It's incredible how you can quote yourself out of context.  I've never   
   > seen anyone do that before.   
      
   No one gets away because someone has to pay. Isn't that RIGHT, Phil?   
      
   Thats the crux of your entire argument here in this thread!   
      
   No high-speed pursuit should EVER be called off, RIGHT?   
      
   No one gets away because someone has to pay.   
      
   The cops HAVE to assume that a greater crime was committed and once   
   a crime happens.....No one gets away because someone has to pay.   
      
   RIGHT, PHIL?????   
      
   No one gets away because someone has to pay.   
      
   --   
   "Bubba got a blowjob, BU$H fucked us all!" - Slim   
      
   George "The AWOL President" Bush: http://awol.gq.nu/4dawol.htm   
      
   WHY IRAQ?: http://www.angelfire.com/creep/gwbush/remindus.html   
      
   VOTE HIM OUT! November 4, 2004   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)