XPost: alt.thebird.copwatch, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: alt.california, nyc.general   
   From: dogglebe@yahoooo.com   
      
   On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:12:05 GMT, slim  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >Phil wrote:   
   >>   
   >> On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:09:25 GMT, slim  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >Chas wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> "LaW Man"  wrote   
   >> >> > The point is that no matter what the police do, whether it be chase or   
   not   
   >> >> > chase, we will always be second guessed, and placed under a microscope,   
   >> >> and   
   >> >> > studied for days and weeks after the incident.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Absolutely.   
   >> >> Any time a citizen gets killed, there should be an investigation, and any   
   >> >> negligence or unprofessional behaviour sanctioned.   
   >> >> Or perhaps you think that police are above the law and anything they do   
   is   
   >> >> ok with you?   
   >> >>   
   >> >   
   >> >Phil agrees with loonman mike! "Someone has to pay!"   
   >>   
   >> It's incredible how you can quote yourself out of context.  I've never   
   >> seen anyone do that before.   
   >   
   >No one gets away because someone has to pay. Isn't that RIGHT, Phil?   
   >   
   >Thats the crux of your entire argument here in this thread!   
   >   
   >No high-speed pursuit should EVER be called off, RIGHT?   
   >   
   >No one gets away because someone has to pay.   
   >   
   >The cops HAVE to assume that a greater crime was committed and once   
   >a crime happens.....No one gets away because someone has to pay.   
   >   
   >RIGHT, PHIL?????   
   >   
   >No one gets away because someone has to pay.   
      
   Can't.........stay.........awake..........zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz   
      
      
   Phil   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)