XPost: alt.thebird.copwatch, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: alt.california, nyc.general   
   From: dogglebe@yahoooo.com   
      
   On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 22:13:48 GMT, slim  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >Phil wrote:   
   >>   
   >> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 07:52:11 -0700, "Chas"    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >"Phil"  wrote   
   >> >> The problem is that MMBs tend to use facts and information that the   
   >> >> police officer does not have.  They also have more time to think   
   >> >> things through.   
   >> >   
   >> >Yes; and that analysis is useful for the next time it happens.   
   >> >High-speed chases have been a problem for a couple of decades. It would   
   seem   
   >> >that the police would start to generate some guidelines that minimize the   
   >> >collateral deaths caused during high-speed chases.   
   >> >D'ya think?   
   >>   
   >> Guidelines would be nice if high speed pursuits were textbook, but   
   >> they're not.  If a complete set of guidelines could be written up,   
   >> covering everything that pertain to these pursuits, the books wouldn't   
   >> fir in a police car.   
   >   
   >OH, COME ON, PHIL!   
   >   
   >Since the law was broken, SOMEONE HAS TO PAY! Right?   
   >   
   >YES OR NO, PHIL!   
   >   
   >Whats the matter? Did you •plonk• me. or is the fact that   
   >your argument on this topic boils down to a simple fact?   
   >   
   >The fact that you think that once the law is broken,   
   >someone has to pay.   
   >   
   >When are YOU turning yourself in for all the times you broke   
   >the law Phil? Every time you spit on the sidewalk, or jaywalk,   
   >you are BREAKING THE LAW!   
   >   
   >Turn yourself in, Phil. They will find you a nice padded cell   
   >where you can exorcise "mike" from your system!   
      
   Grow up, Mike.   
      
   Or atleast be interesting.   
      
      
   Phil   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)