From: rrufiange@cfl.rr.com   
      
   "Morphy's ghost"  wrote in message   
   news:8lyBb.14021$ou2.3938@bignews5.bellsouth.net...   
   > Let's see....   
   >   
   > President Bush wants to eliminate weapons of mass destruction.   
      
   President Bush was once quoted as saying that a SAM Battery was a weapon of   
   mass destruction.   
      
   President Bush would also like to eliminate "threats" to Homeland Security.   
      
   > Adolf Hitler wanted to eliminate Jews, homosexuals, Christianity, slavonic   
   > peoples,etc., etc., etc.   
   >   
   > By equating the two, Stewie wants to eliminate your common sense.   
      
   There's no true comparison with Hitler, atleast for Bush, although I don't   
   know Cheney all that well.   
      
   > > The geatest danger to the world since Hitler... perhaps even greater a   
   > danger.   
   > > [and recall schwarzenegger said Hitler was a cool guy]   
      
   No, try again.  Schwarzenegger said he admired Hitler's ability to persuade   
   people and speak in public.  He admired Hitler's charisma.   
      
   > > These are the times in which we live.   
   > > The really tragic thing is that those who don't understand history are   
   > doomed   
   > > to repeat it and if there are enough of them they will make those who do   
   > > understand history go through it with them. Deja vu all over again.   
      
   True, but what has that to do with comparing someone to Hitler?   
      
   If you can't judge a man by his own merits, and nothing else, no sense   
   talking about it.   
   No matter what Bush did, even if he masterminded the civilian casualties of   
   9/11 personally, he couldn't compare with the body count under Hitler's   
   belt.   
      
   > > So exactly where are those WMD's.   
   > > It wouldn't by any chance be that Bsuh/Cheney was lying and they simply   
   > used   
   > > 911 to carry out the plan to take over Iraq that they have been   
   salivating   
   > over   
   > > since Ronny Raygun made it all seem possible?   
      
   9/11 is a scapegoat.  It always has been, and always will be.  Like most   
   political chess pieces, 9/11 will be used, and abused, to the point of   
   absurdity.  Remember Congress gave Bush the necessary power to go after the   
   perpetrators of 9/11.  That was a mission.   
   We had a tragedy, we lost lives, we wanted to get those who did it.  Bush   
   appeared to feel the same way, but with the near child-like attention span   
   we've seen him display many times, he lost interest somehow, lost interest   
   in justice, and began to point shaky fingers in many directions, claiming   
   many connections to al Qaeda, even sidelined the war on "terror" to   
   terrorize our own people at home by telling us spur-of-the-moment that we'd   
   be going to war with Iraq, "if Saddam didn't just give up his seat and walk   
   away".  Now, would you simply stand down and run away from your home if   
   someone sent you a letter claiming they were going to take it?  Neither   
   would ANY Texan.  The man was Governor of Texas, representing the wishes and   
   best interest of many, but knew nothing at all about being human?   
      
   I, for one, would not be surprised at all if, by the time the election rolls   
   around, another "convenient" 9/11-like attack occurs on our soil,   
   conveniently capitized upon by good ol' Bush, who of course only has our   
   best interest on his mind.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)