XPost: alt.revisionism, soc.culture.jewish, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.law-enforcement
From: roger@
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Seneca wrote
in message :
>"Philip Mathews" wrote in message
>news:c6bd4de7.0312091107.863a152@posting.google.com...
>> "Seneca" wrote in message
>news:...
>> > "Steven Mock" wrote in message
>> > news:Xns944BF365B5D34smocknizkororg@140.99.99.130...
>> > > "Seneca" wrote in
>> > > news:K04Bb.4366$MO7.539@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com:
>> > > > My witch hazel is kosher. (How the hell can witch hazel be kosher?)
>> > > > My Joy dishwashing liquid is kosher. (What?!) My Ajax cleanser is
>> > > > kosher.
>> > > > (Oy, vey.) All these items, and thousands more I'm sure, carry the
>> > > > little symbols showing that some rabbinical organization or other
>> > > > has skimmed its share off the manufacturer's profit margin.
>> > > If that's all it meant then why would manufacturers do it?
>> > Why indeed, Steven? Why indeed?
>> Well, we could assume that business people have a good reason, or we
>> could think like the Jew hater Seneca, and make up some nefarious
>> scheme.
>Enquiring how witch hazel, dishwashing liquid, etc. can be kosher makes me a
>Jew hater? That does not compute, Philthy.
seneca pretend that zir history here in alt.rev is not well known...
>> > > Do they simply
>> > > like giving money to "rabbinical organizations"? Or do they get
>> > > something in return?
>> > Good questions. I would like to know too.
>> And would you like to know why businesses give money to consultants,
>> design firms, accountants, etc.,
>Oh. Rabbis serve these businesses in ways similar to those of consultants,
>design firms, accountants, etc.? You are saying, then, that rabbis and their
>organizations are just *employed* by these businesses as a sort of service
>provider, the service being one that the business deems essential? Procter &
>Gamble feel they dare not market Joy until they've made sure it's certified
>kosher?
"Dare not?"
No.
"Will be more profitable for them (by reaching an additional market
segment?)"
Yes.
But then, seneca also pretends that this has not been explained many
many times...
>> or is your curiosity only with things
>> which involves Jews?
>I have curiosity about many things, Philthy.
And yet the only ones you bother to talk about here are the ones that
you have distorted into casting a bad light on the Jews.
Funny, that.
>> > Another good question is, How can things like witch hazel, kitchen
>> > cleansers
>> > and dishwashing liquids be kosher? My dictionary says kosher means
>> > "conforming to dietary laws; ritually pure." That has always been my
>> > understanding as well. Can you explain to me how these non-dietary
>> > things (and presumably many others) can be kosher?
>> They come into contact with items which are in contact with food.
>Witch hazel does? I don't think so.
Witch hazel is used in soaps fairly often (especially the "home made"
sort,) your credulity notwithstanding.
>> > What this *appears* to be is a device for squeezing money out of
>> > manufacturers for Jewish interests and causes, completely unrelated to
>> > the product.
>> Really! Now isn't that theory a surprise, coming from "Seneca"!
>>
>> All these gullible business people are unknowingly squeezed by these
>> Jews, and it takes someone like "Seneca" to figure it out.
>Who said "unknowingly"? I presume the people making those decisions are
>doing so consciously. What the reasons are, exactly, is what I'm curious
>about.
And are you also interested in the reasons why a particular ad
campaign is chosen, or a given landscaping company employed?
There might be Jooos involved in those business decisions too, you
know...
>> >Why manufacturers would go along with this is still the most
>> > interesting question.
>> Most intelligent people would consider that question so obvious as to
>> be of little interest. But to a Jew hater, anything Jewish is
>> interesting.
>By the same principle, I suppose, anyone who hates broccoli must be
>interested in all things related to broccoli. Your logical processes are
>wonderful to behold, Philthy.
ONly if the broccoli hater has to resort to distortions and outright
lies in an attempt to justify zir hatred so that it doesn't look quite
so irrational...
>> > Presumably they either believe they are getting
>> > something in return for paying the "kosher tax" or that they will be
>> > hurt in some way if they do not.
>> And now the Jew hater utters the usual inanity, calling a fee a tax,
>> as if it differs from the hundreds of others fees businesses pay for
>> services all the time.
>I think this "fee" is *substantially* different "from the hundreds of others
>fees businesses pay for services all the time."
Of *course* you do, but are completely unable to offer a rational
reason why...
>Do Catholic organizations exact any similar, comparable or analogous fee
>from businesses?
Not that I am aware.
>Muslim?
Matter of fact, yes.
>Protestant? Buddhist? HIndu? Zoroastrian? Any other
> clerical or religious-affiliated organizations at all?
Why limit it to religious groups -- there is a dietary concern. Why
don't you complain about the motivations of the "Heart Friendly"
people? The "Certified Vegan" folks?
Remember -- some of those folks could be Jooos...
>Where are *their* little symbols on my containers of Ajax, Joy or witch
>hazel?
The same placement as your Joo-Free logo...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
