XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
      
   There is no need to follow such ridiculous procedures. Just delete all the   
   material that the reply places in the email and type your new comments. The   
   flow of the discussion is revealed by the indenting on the main page. If one   
   needs to refer  to earlier material it is just a click away.   
      
      
   "Ivan Gowch"  wrote in message   
   news:l6petvk058gpt20dpoh6142ob000mlao8d@4ax.com...   
   > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:28:09 GMT,  wrote:   
   >   
   > ==>"Caring people wouldn't be making such asinine statements"   
   > ==>   
   > ==>What kind of asinine statement is that?   
   > ==>   
   > ==>"David V."  wrote in message   
   > ==>news:YO-dnV33fYK261Ki4p2dnA@sti.net...   
   > ==>> Moorehead Johnson wrote:   
   > ==>> >   
   > ==>> > Caring people don't abort developing human lives because   
   > ==>> > they simply don't want them.   
   > ==>>   
   > ==>> Caring people wouldn't be making such asinine statements.   
   >   
   >   
   > Allow me to point out that, in order to make this   
   > post of yours make sense, you REPEATED the   
   > material you were responding to at the top of   
   > the post.  Silly, no?   
   >   
   > That bit of wasteful nonsense would not be   
   > necessary if you would stop top-posting and place   
   > your replies UNDERNEATH the material you are   
   > responding to, as smart Usenet users do.   
   >   
   >   
   > --   
   >   
   > The virtue most often rewarded is patience.   
   > -Ivan Gowch   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)