XPost: alt.revisionism, soc.culture.jewish, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.law-enforcement
From: roger@
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Seneca wrote
in message
:
>"Roger" wrote in message
>news:895aab3e30e875f7fded821caf44d52b@news.teranews.com...
[ . . . ]
>> >> >> > > Do they simply
>> >> >> > > like giving money to "rabbinical organizations"? Or do they get
>> >> >> > > something in return?
>> >> >> > Good questions. I would like to know too.
>> >> >> And would you like to know why businesses give money to consultants,
>> >> >> design firms, accountants, etc.,
>> >> >Oh. Rabbis serve these businesses in ways similar to those of
>> >> >consultants,
>> >> >design firms, accountants, etc.? You are saying, then, that rabbis and
>> >> >their
>> >> >organizations are just *employed* by these businesses as a sort of
>> >> >service
>> >> >provider, the service being one that the business deems essential?
>> >> >Procter &
>> >> >Gamble feel they dare not market Joy until they've made sure it's
>> >> >certified kosher?
>> >> "Dare not?"
>> >>
>> >> No.
>> >>
>> >> "Will be more profitable for them (by reaching an additional market
>> >> segment?)"
>> >>
>> >> Yes.
>> >>
>> >> But then, seneca also pretends that this has not been explained many
>> >> many times...
>> >It may have been for all I know; I've just returned to this NG after a
>> >long absence.
>> And you cannot remember the previous conversations you have run from
>> on this topic?
>On kosher tax? No, I cannot. I do remember the subject coming up (the kosher
>tax was news to me at the time), but I don't recall commenting on it. I may
>have, or not, but I certainly have not "run from" any such conversations.
And given that you do not remember the conversations which *did* take
place, your recollection of retreat cannot be afforded any credibility
either.
You did.
>> >> >> or is your curiosity only with things
>> >> >> which involves Jews?
>> >> >I have curiosity about many things, Philthy.
>> >> And yet the only ones you bother to talk about here are the ones that
>> >> you have distorted into casting a bad light on the Jews.
>> >>
>> >> Funny, that.
>> >I'm posting to the alt.revisionism NG. What's funny about it?
>> That your Jew hatred does not have any impact on the historical facts
>> of the Holocaust, and simply acts as the reason for your mindless
>> denial of the same.
>Do Jewish researchers and scholars who question much of the Holocaust
>mythology also have "Jew hatred" in your opinion?
Your question is too vague: to which *specific* questions about the
historical facts (it's not myth, no matter how many times you post
that lie) of the Holocaust are you referring, and by whom?
>[ . . . ]
>> >> >> > What this *appears* to be is a device for squeezing money out of
>> >> >> > manufacturers for Jewish interests and causes, completely
>> >> >> > unrelated to the product.
>> >> >> Really! Now isn't that theory a surprise, coming from "Seneca"!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> All these gullible business people are unknowingly squeezed by these
>> >> >> Jews, and it takes someone like "Seneca" to figure it out.
>> >> >Who said "unknowingly"? I presume the people making those decisions
>> >> >are
>> >> >doing so consciously. What the reasons are, exactly, is what I'm
>> >> >curious about.
>> >> And are you also interested in the reasons why a particular ad
>> >> campaign is chosen, or a given landscaping company employed?
>> >I might be, if I frequented an advertising or landscaping newsgroup. But
>> >I don't.
>> Nor are you posting to exclusively newsgroups concerned with Kosher
>> (of which your stated ng is definitely not one.)
>I'm just replying. I don't change the message headers, so the replies go
>wherever they go.
And the ng you target is alt.rev, and discussions of kosher
certification are not on topic here, except as they relate to your Jew
hatred, and then only because your mindless denial of the historical
facts which *are* on topic have the same root cause.
>> >> There might be Jooos involved in those business decisions too, you
>> >> know...
>> >> >> > Why manufacturers would go along with this is still the most
>> >> >> > interesting question.
>> >> >> Most intelligent people would consider that question so obvious as
>> >> >> to be of little interest. But to a Jew hater, anything Jewish is
>> >> >> interesting.
>> >> >By the same principle, I suppose, anyone who hates broccoli must be
>> >> >interested in all things related to broccoli. Your logical processes
>> >> >are wonderful to behold, Philthy.
>> >> Only if the broccoli hater has to resort to distortions and outright
>> >> lies in an attempt to justify zir hatred so that it doesn't look quite
>> >> so irrational...
>> >Do broccoli haters tend to do that, in your experience?
>> No, They are completely up front that they simply do not like
>> broccoli and feel no need to foist their views on anyone else,
>> denigrate those that do not share that dislike, nor advocate the
>> elimination (or restrict the impact) of broccoli from society.
>>
>> How about you?
>I like broccoli, especially with cheese. Never a word of criticism of
>broccoli will you hear from me.
That was not the question.
Do broccoli haters tend to resort to distortions and outright lies in
an attempt to justify zir hatred so that it doesn't look quite so
irrational, in your experience?
>*UNLESS* of course broccoli starts tapping my tax dollars to support a
>specially privileged group, or some foreign cause, or begins to skim
>producers' profits for itself or something like that. In such a case I would
>criticize broccoli severely and perhaps frequently. But I don't expect that
>to happen. Broccoli in my experience has always behaved decently, honorably
>and unselfishly.
And since Jews do none of the above exclusively nor illegally, what is
your excuse for singling them out for your hatred?
>> >> >> > Presumably they either believe they are getting
>> >> >> > something in return for paying the "kosher tax" or that they will
>> >> >> > be hurt in some way if they do not.
>> >> >> And now the Jew hater utters the usual inanity, calling a fee a tax,
>> >> >> as if it differs from the hundreds of others fees businesses pay
>> >> >> for services all the time.
>> >> >I think this "fee" is *substantially* different "from the hundreds of
>> >> >others fees businesses pay for services all the time."
>> >> Of *course* you do, but are completely unable to offer a rational
>> >> reason why...
>> No matter how many times you have been called on it.
And so no longer even try
>> >> >Do Catholic organizations exact any similar, comparable or analogous
>> >> >fee from businesses?
>> >> Not that I am aware.
>> >> >Muslim?
>> >> Matter of fact, yes.
>> >Really? What's *their* symbol on the container?
>> http://www.ifanca.org/ifanca.htm
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
