XPost: alt.revisionism, soc.culture.jewish, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.law-enforcement
From: roger@
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Seneca wrote
in message
<9lNBb.35673$4H2.30013@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com>:
>"Roger" wrote in message
>news:fb8271cd4eb1026b2b61159a6b319d40@news.teranews.com...
[ . . . ]
>> >> >> >> > > Do they simply
>> >> >> >> > > like giving money to "rabbinical organizations"? Or do they
>> >> >> >> > > get something in return?
>> >> >> >> > Good questions. I would like to know too.
>> >> >> >> And would you like to know why businesses give money to
>> >> >> >> consultants, design firms, accountants, etc.,
>> >> >> >Oh. Rabbis serve these businesses in ways similar to those of
>> >> >> >consultants,
>> >> >> >design firms, accountants, etc.? You are saying, then, that rabbis
>> >> >> >and their
>> >> >> >organizations are just *employed* by these businesses as a sort of
>> >> >> >service
>> >> >> >provider, the service being one that the business deems essential?
>> >> >> >Procter &
>> >> >> >Gamble feel they dare not market Joy until they've made sure it's
>> >> >> >certified kosher?
>> >> >> "Dare not?"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> No.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Will be more profitable for them (by reaching an additional market
>> >> >> segment?)"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yes.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But then, seneca also pretends that this has not been explained many
>> >> >> many times...
>> >> >It may have been for all I know; I've just returned to this NG after a
>> >> >long absence.
>> >> And you cannot remember the previous conversations you have run from
>> >> on this topic?
>> >On kosher tax? No, I cannot. I do remember the subject coming up (the
>> >kosher
>> >tax was news to me at the time), but I don't recall commenting on it. I
>> >may
>> >have, or not, but I certainly have not "run from" any such conversations.
>> And given that you do not remember the conversations which *did* take
>> place, your recollection of retreat cannot be afforded any credibility
>> either.
>>
>> You did.
>I may have. I presume whatever comments I made were germane, relevant and to
>the point.
No more so than you current bobbing and weaving.
>> >> >> >> or is your curiosity only with things
>> >> >> >> which involves Jews?
>> >> >> >I have curiosity about many things, Philthy.
>> >> >> And yet the only ones you bother to talk about here are the ones
>> >> >> that you have distorted into casting a bad light on the Jews.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Funny, that.
>> >> >I'm posting to the alt.revisionism NG. What's funny about it?
>> >> That your Jew hatred does not have any impact on the historical facts
>> >> of the Holocaust, and simply acts as the reason for your mindless
>> >> denial of the same.
>> >Do Jewish researchers and scholars who question much of the Holocaust
>> >mythology also have "Jew hatred" in your opinion?
>> Your question is too vague: to which *specific* questions about the
>> historical facts (it's not myth, no matter how many times you post
>> that lie) of the Holocaust are you referring, and by whom?
>Gas chambers, for starters.
What *about* gas chambers?
>I really think it all begins and ends with gas chambers. That seems to be
>the cornerstone of the whole Holocaust mythology. That's the part that must
>be defended at all costs, lest the whole patchwork pile of bullshit come
>tumbling down.
And to which *specific* "myths" are you referring, and which Jewish
researchers are questioning them?
[ . . . ]
>> >> >> >> > What this *appears* to be is a device for squeezing money out
>> >> >> >> > of manufacturers for Jewish interests and causes, completely
>> >> >> >> > unrelated to the product.
>> >> >> >> Really! Now isn't that theory a surprise, coming from "Seneca"!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> All these gullible business people are unknowingly squeezed by
>> >> >> >> these Jews, and it takes someone like "Seneca" to figure it out.
>> >> >> >Who said "unknowingly"? I presume the people making those decisions
>> >> >> >are
>> >> >> >doing so consciously. What the reasons are, exactly, is what I'm
>> >> >> >curious about.
>> >> >> And are you also interested in the reasons why a particular ad
>> >> >> campaign is chosen, or a given landscaping company employed?
>> >> >I might be, if I frequented an advertising or landscaping newsgroup.
>> >> >But I don't.
>> >> Nor are you posting to exclusively newsgroups concerned with Kosher
>> >> (of which your stated ng is definitely not one.)
>> >I'm just replying. I don't change the message headers, so the replies go
>> >wherever they go.
>> And the ng you target is alt.rev, and discussions of kosher
>> certification are not on topic here,
>Sure they are. Did the kosher tax even *exist* before the so-called
>Holocaust?
No, which is part of why kosher certification has no effect on the
historical facts of the Holocaust.
>> except as they relate to your Jew
>> hatred, [ . . . ]
>I don't hate Jews (I think you've been told this a hundred times or so, but
>maybe it just slips your mind).
Yes, you've p[robably lied about it at *least* that many times.
>I do get pretty fed up with all the Holocaust bullshit.
Then stop spewing it, and acknowledge the historical facts of the
matter.
>If you want to accuse me of "Holocaust bullshit hatred,"
>I will not argue with you. How this magically translates into "Jew hatred"
>you have yet to explain.
It doesn't, so I feel no need to.
Your Holocaust denial is simply one manifestation of your
anti-semitism, nor is it the only one you demonstrate every time you
come crawling back.
This conversation a case in point.
>Of course you *deliberately* confuse one with the other, don't you?
No, I don't.
>Accusations of "Jew hatred" are really the only defenses, the only
>fortifications you can put up to protect your shaky, crumbling Holocaust
>mythology--isn't that so?
Not even close.
>> >> >By the same principle, I suppose, anyone who hates broccoli must be
>> >> >interested in all things related to broccoli. Your logical processes
>> >> >are wonderful to behold, Philthy.
>> >> Only if the broccoli hater has to resort to distortions and outright
>> >> lies in an attempt to justify zir hatred so that it doesn't look quite
>> >> so irrational...
>> >Do broccoli haters tend to do that, in your experience?
>> No, They are completely up front that they simply do not like
>> broccoli and feel no need to foist their views on anyone else,
>> denigrate those that do not share that dislike, nor advocate the
>> elimination (or restrict the impact) of broccoli from society.
>>
>> How about you?
>I like broccoli, especially with cheese. Never a word of criticism of
>broccoli will you hear from me.
That was not the question.
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
