XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa
XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican
XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement
From: DEMI_GOD_@SHAW.CA
"Sissy" wrote in message
news:kfRBb.2280$Dt6.72568@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
>
> "_ G O D _" wrote in message
> news:OLNBb.650984$9l5.435018@pd7tw2no...
> >
> > So, his imbecility is exposed to just about all of the people who are
capable
> > of reading and willing to dig out the facts from archives. My advice to
> > you is to read it for yourself. May be only than you will be qualified
for
> > praising Hitler's "charisma". Because I'm sure you wouldn't want his
> > "charisma" to affect you personally.
>
> Schwartzenegger idolized Hitler, he admired Hitler's speaking
> charisma, his ability to hold the attention of the people.
> Atleast try to pretend that you're paying attention, assfucker.
I do pay attention, Sissy, and I agree with Stewie's remark about the part
he said on account of Schwartzenigger that Hitler was as charismatic as any
imbecile like yourself can be.
But I did not fuck you in the ass, you stupid Sissy, because I'd never do
that to anyone. To me, fucking someone in the ass is not only a taboo. Just
hearing about homosexuality is turning my stomach and makes me puke.
Therefore I always try to skip all conversations on this subject, also - in
order to avoid offending the faggots.
It must be someone else did that to you, if you indeed have such suspicion,
and your ass hearts tremendously. I hope it has not an itch for that,
though...
>
> > Now, after being quite informed about your lack of imagination I can
> > understand WHY would you be in favor of incarceration industry, lacking
> > the experience of being imprisoned yourself, or haven't seen any better
> > in your life.
>
> I never said I was in favor of the incarceration industry...
> It is, however, less destructive than your proposed solution of banishment
> as opposed to justice.
You assert that you aren't in favor of the incarceration industry, but being
in favor of status quo is totally contradicting to your assertion. Because
if you'd indeed were opposing the incarceration industry you wouldn't have
been against my position, or at least have offered your own solutions, which
could be publicly discussed, possibly without throwing insults similar to
yours.
Banishment, in the capacity of the alternative to forceful incarceration, is
not in any way opposing to justice. It's only an avenue of provision of
conformity to the Universal standards of Human Rights, allowing people to
exercise their inalienable rights to life, liberty and dignity in their
work. It also provides an opportunity to dispose, and get rid of state
sanctioned slavery (a major form it, despite universally declared abolition
of all its forms 56 years ago) and to void any possibility of unfair
exploitation of prison labor in the future.
>
> > Don't you know that you may become a victim of injustice and subsequent
> > incarceration? But it will be too late to reverse your thoughts and
position...
>
> Says who?
>
This is merely a statement of fact, proven by many centuries of recorded
history. All people tend to deny the fact that they may become the victims
of brutality and injustice which is being practiced by the authorities. Up
until the very moment they themselves have fallen victims to it. You are
NOT an exception to this fact.
I remember similar conversation with Walty. Just days before the incident
of him getting tangled in the web of "legal matters"...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
