XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime
XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism
From: gowch@SPAMTHEENOThotmail.com
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 03:26:04 GMT, "Daniel T."
wrote:
[snip]
==>> Bullshit. In no sense of the word are children
==>> "property." They may be in their parents' legal
==>> custody, but they are persons, with rights that
==>> are wholly separate and distinct from their
==>> parents'.
==>>
==>> If you don't believe this, try breaking your kid's
==>> arm, and see how the law treats assholes who
==>> treat their children as "property."
==>You also can't despose (sic) of a led(sic)-acid battery in the county sewer
system.
==>So is a led(sic)-acid battery not "property" just because there are some
==>things you can't legaly (sic) do with it? Does it have "rights"?
You really sound too dumb to respond to, but I've
got nothing better to do at the moment, so . . .
You understand, don't you, that you may sell your
lead-acid battery, or give it away, for that matter,
because it is your property.
Try selling your kid and see what happens.
Now, before you rush madly off to dig up another
absurd example, let me just say . . . never mind.
If you really can't appreciate the difference between
a child and an inanimate piece of property I can't be
bothered trying to rescue you from the abyss of
stupidity you reside in. Life is too short.
Also, if you really see no difference between a child
and a thing, I hope to hell that you are as sterile as
boiling alcohol, because the thought of you as a
parent is too horrible to contemplate.
--
Better an abortion clinic on every streetcorner
than the birth of one more unwanted child.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
