XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.conspiracy, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: roger@   
      
   In one age, called the Second Age by some,   
      (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)   
         someone claiming to be Seneca wrote   
            in message :   
      
   >"Roger"  wrote in message   
   >news:943ce18a2e5bcce3e04bb199b4071e66@news.teranews.com...   
      
     [ . . . ]   
      
   >> >> >> >I notice that my Maxwell House coffee is kosher taxed, and so is my   
   >> >> >> >Coors   
   >> >> >> >beer. I doubt there are any dairy products in a can of either   
   >> >> >> >coffee or beer, whether kosher or not.   
      
   >> >> >> Why is it that you continue to refer to certification as a tax?   
   >> >> >> WHich   
   >> >> >> governmental agency (which are the only entities capable of levying   
   >> >> >> a tax) do you claim are administering Kosher certification?   
      
   >> >> >"Kosher tax" is what it is most commonly called.   
      
   >> >> ... by anti-semites such as seneca.   
      
   >> >I'm not sure what you expect to gain by continuing to call people   
   >> >anti-Semites who are not.   
      
   >> I expect nothing, since I don't.   
      
   >What other interpretation can be made of "anti-semites such as seneca"?   
      
   You specified "who are not."  You, demonstrably, are as are the   
   authors of pages using that term (save when it is simply quoted from   
   someone else.)   
      
   >> >Really, do you suppose calling someone an   
   >> >anti-Semite a thousand times or so will make it *less* likely that he   
   >> >will harbor any ill feeling toward Jews?   
      
   >> Since their anti-semitism is irrational on the face of it, there's no   
   >> telling what would increase or decrease that irrational hatred.   
      
     [ . . . ]   
      
        
      
   Or would you like to try to make the case that any of those links   
   which do not simply quote the term are *not* of an anti-semitic   
   nature?  Any of them at all?   
      
   >All the "irrational hatred" seems to be coming from your side of the debate.   
   >Anyone who disputes or even questions something presented as historical   
   >fact, but for which there is no physical evidence and no logical reason, you   
   >call an "anti-Semite."   
      
   Lie, given the mountains of evidence for the historical fact of the   
   Holocaust.   
      
   And why must you lie to justify your hatred?   
      
   >Anyone who raises an eyebrow at well-organized   
   >pressure groups and propagandists who seek to promote their co-religionists'   
   >national socialism and brutal aggression at the expense of the American   
   >taxpayer, you call an "anti-Semite."   
      
   Of course, you have yet to demonstrate any of this, yet present it as   
   a given.   
      
   Why must you lie to justify your hatred?   
      
   >Anyone who notices that such   
   >well-funded pressure groups on an international scale seek to suppress free   
   >speech and open inquiry (unfortunately with much success in Canada and   
   >Europe), you call an "anti-Semite."   
      
   Of course, you have yet to demonstrate any of this, yet present it as   
   a given.   
      
   Why must you lie to justify your hatred?   
      
   >Hasn't it occurred to you that you (and the other Dershowitzniks) are   
   >gradually but inexorably reducing the term "anti-Semite" to perfect   
   >meaninglessness?   
      
   No, because it isn't meaningless, no matter how much you'd like to   
   pretend that it is.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)