XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: erj66@xs4all.nl   
      
   On 13-12-2003 05:57, in article   
   3513d8b1.0312122057.6d712b56@posting.google.com, "ulTRAX"   
    wrote:   
      
   > TRANSLATION: The US Constitution is anti-democratic... therefore fails   
   > the test of moral legitimacy prescribed in the Declaration of   
   > Independence. If this anti-democratic formula helps the RR'tards on   
   > the Right impose their 1st  century Christian psychosis on a 21st   
   > century  nation... then it's morally legitimate.   
   >   
   > Do I have you pegged Fluffy? Feel free to just confess you have no use   
   > for, or respect for, democracy.   
      
      
   Coming from a small state, I have no respect for rule by mob.   
      
   The USA is not a Democracy. It is a Republic, which is steps removed from   
   democracy...on purpose, in order to prevent mob tyranny.   
      
   Let me ask...what do you think you would get if the usa were a direct   
   democracy?   
      
   Let me also add, that since you  have stated that you feel it is unfair that   
   peoples' votes from small state's count for more than those from big states,   
   you do have the freedom to move to a small state to make your own vote count   
   for more...if you feel that is the way it works.   
      
   And before you freak out and say that limits my opportunities, certainly   
   living in Connecticut, Delaware, or Indiana when your business is in New   
   York, Washington or Chicago is hardly debilitating.   
      
   Also, if you don't like it, you do have the opportunity to leave.   
      
   I did, and it worked out well.   
      
   Have you the guts?   
      
   EJ   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)