XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: erj66@xs4all.nl   
      
   On 13-12-2003 18:37, in article   
   Xns94507654F9790theloneweaselyahooco@130.133.1.4, "The Lone Weasel"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   > "...nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness   
   > against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property,   
   > without due process of law..."   
   >   
   > Which you dishonestly chopped down to...   
   >   
   >>  "... nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property,   
   >>  without due process of   
   >> law."   
      
      
   What is dishonest about it? I used an ellipsis to show that I started form   
   somewhere other than the beginning. Can you tell me what the previous   
   portion, quoted here for your convenience, has to do with the subject of   
   whether or not you have a right to your car?   
      
   "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise   
   infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a   
   Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval   
   forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of   
   War or public danger;"   
      
   Please?   
      
   EJ   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)