XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: DEMI_GOD_@SHAW.CA   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:GB%Cb.125251$Ek.100333@twister.austin.rr.com...   
   >   
   >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > Of course, it is my opinion. But it is based on an   
   > objective assement of the facts, in my opinion.   
      
   What is "assement", anyway?   
      
   But I assume that your opinion, which is mainly based on ignorance,   
   superstitious beliefs and fabricated (i.e..- concocted by your individual   
   fantasy) "facts" are not enough in order to created a practical tool to   
   handle the  REALITY  OF  LIFE.   
      
   > After repeated requests by me, you still have not   
   > provided  the scientific evidence that you claim   
   > allows you to differentiate between the fetus at 9   
   > months and still attached to the cord and the fetus   
   > one second later that is no longer attached. What is the   
   > evidence.   
      
   You must have been asking me that in your silent payers, which aren't always   
   reaching me. But now, since you have accomplished the proper contact, I'm   
   getting a clear reception, and I might be able to transmit my respond to you   
   just as clear.   
      
   The science is stating that you do not have to be smart enough to be a   
   neurosurgeon in order to know the facts of creation of life. Penetration of   
   a single sperm into an egg is enough for conception of an embryo, which with   
   its growth gradually turns into a fetus, which after a full term of   
   pregnancy and successful delivery can become a person. Because as soon as he   
   separated from his mother and an umbilical cord is cut, he automatically   
   acquires full legal status of a person.  In fact, by law, this event is   
   effecting person's national status, which is integral to the country of   
   "birth".  (please note that a place of conception does not effect it)   
      
   > They are in all manner the same entity except   
   > for the minor fact of their manner of respirating.   
   > If this is the only difference, then I have proven my case.   
   >   
   When you will be able to put an  EQUASION  between 1 and 2, you will   
   certainly be able to erase that difference.  Simple mathematical logic,   
   which is always being considered in application of the law is sufficient   
   enough to show you the difference.  But when you are making TWO objects out   
   of ONE by drawing the line, the LAW requires the evidence of line being   
   drawn...  And it's YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO SHOW THAT LINE, including the   
   place where it has been drawn.   
      
   In my informed opinion, between the two of you, Ivan Gowch has a better view   
   of this line than you. Because his is clear and precise, while your is   
   completely obscured and vague.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)