XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
      
   "_ G O D _"  wrote in message   
   news:Yg3Db.701746$6C4.270458@pd7tw1no...   
   >   
   >  wrote in message   
   > news:GB%Cb.125251$Ek.100333@twister.austin.rr.com...   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > Of course, it is my opinion. But it is based on an   
   > > objective assement of the facts, in my opinion.   
   >   
   > What is "assement", anyway?   
   >   
   > But I assume that your opinion, which is mainly based on ignorance,   
   > superstitious beliefs and fabricated (i.e..- concocted by your individual   
   > fantasy) "facts" are not enough in order to created a practical tool to   
   > handle the  REALITY  OF  LIFE.   
   >   
   > > After repeated requests by me, you still have not   
   > > provided  the scientific evidence that you claim   
   > > allows you to differentiate between the fetus at 9   
   > > months and still attached to the cord and the fetus   
   > > one second later that is no longer attached. What is the   
   > > evidence.   
   >   
   > You must have been asking me that in your silent payers, which aren't   
   always   
   > reaching me. But now, since you have accomplished the proper contact, I'm   
   > getting a clear reception, and I might be able to transmit my respond to   
   you   
   > just as clear.   
   >   
   > The science is stating that you do not have to be smart enough to be a   
   > neurosurgeon in order to know the facts of creation of life. Penetration   
   of   
   > a single sperm into an egg is enough for conception of an embryo, which   
   with   
   > its growth gradually turns into a fetus, which after a full term of   
   > pregnancy and successful delivery can become a person. Because as soon as   
   he   
   > separated from his mother and an umbilical cord is cut, he automatically   
   > acquires full legal status of a person.  In fact, by law, this event is   
   > effecting person's national status, which is integral to the country of   
   > "birth".  (please note that a place of conception does not effect it)   
   >   
   > > They are in all manner the same entity except   
   > > for the minor fact of their manner of respirating.   
   > > If this is the only difference, then I have proven my case.   
   > >   
   > When you will be able to put an  EQUASION  between 1 and 2, you will   
   > certainly be able to erase that difference.  Simple mathematical logic,   
   > which is always being considered in application of the law is sufficient   
   > enough to show you the difference.  But when you are making TWO objects   
   out   
   > of ONE by drawing the line, the LAW requires the evidence of line being   
   > drawn...  And it's YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO SHOW THAT LINE, including the   
   > place where it has been drawn.   
   >   
   > In my informed opinion, between the two of you, Ivan Gowch has a better   
   view   
   > of this line than you. Because his is clear and precise, while your is   
   > completely obscured and vague.   
      
   The process of transforming a zygote into a human being that cannot   
   be killed at the whim of mother or father or both   
   does not have any demarcation points to tell us when we should kill or not   
   kill. It is up   
   to society to decide that. If you think that cutting the cord is such a   
   point, then   
   I give up on reasoning with you. Reasoning with you is like tryiing to   
   explain evolution to creationists. Hopeless.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)