XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime
XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism
From: DEMI_GOD_@SHAW.CA
wrote in message
news:VO3Db.125322$Ek.586@twister.austin.rr.com...
>
>
>
> The process of transforming a zygote into a human being that cannot
> be killed at the whim of mother or father or both does not have any
> demarcation points to tell us when we should kill or not kill. It is up
> to society to decide that. If you think that cutting the cord is such a
> point, then I give up on reasoning with you. Reasoning with you is
> like tryiing to explain evolution to creationists. Hopeless.
>
You have already expressed your intentions to bypass the law and
individuals' rights in favor of "collective's desire to dictate termination
of pregnancy and what a woman is suppose to do with her own body"... Isn't
it already rich enough to explain your "reasoning?" You ought to be very
tired repeating yourself over and again, and therefore may be excused....
Your "reasoning" is similar to legislating people not to get ill, or to
order a person to grow a leg, if one is missing it. Although the reversed
had indeed took place and practiced by the mob in not so ancient history of
mankind.
You should understand, that in REAL life it's impossible to police every
step of every individual. Especially when every individual is not only
being influenced by own desires, but also - empowered by personal
entitlement to make own decisions. But most importantly, you are totally
ignoring persons individual rights to be in control of own destiny. It is
lame to disregard the responsibility of a pregnant woman to do whatever she
thinks is best for her, her body and her loved ones, people she looks after
or cares for, and vice versa....
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
