XPost: talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
   From: DEMI_GOD_@SHAW.CA   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:Lr8Db.125558$Ek.55201@twister.austin.rr.com...   
   >   
   > "_ G O D _"  wrote in message   
   > news:IP5Db.704744$pl3.126562@pd7tw3no...   
   > >   
   > >  wrote in message   
   > > news:gX3Db.125325$Ek.57607@twister.austin.rr.com...   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > The government should assure that all   
   > > > have equal access.   
   > > >   
   > > Are you suggesting now that taxpayers' money should be equally   
   distributed   
   > > among females in order to enable them to exercise their frutility and to   
   > > support their idleness in duration of full term of pregnancy?   
      
      
   > You're inconsistent again. First you say my position would discriminate   
   > against poor women, then you reverse field when I explain how it wouldn't.   
      
   It was not a call for your judgment, but merely a question, because you did   
   not specify WHAT exactly had to be accessed on the equal basis, and by   
   whom...  But I must have made a hasty assumption on the basis of information   
   you provided in combination of your position.   
      
   I share your position of equal access to medical help in abortion   
   procedures, because it's a hell of a lot healthier to have medical   
   professionals to do it, rather than taking a risk in questionable   
   conditions.   
      
   But it seems to me that you are insisting on tying pregnancy to a public   
   money which you think should be given to women in duration of their   
   pregnancy....   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)