XPost: alt.thebird.copwatch, us.military.army, alt.california   
   XPost: nyc.general   
   From: Central222@hotmail.com   
      
   slim wrote:   
   >   
   > Phil wrote:   
   > >   
   > > On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 04:33:02 GMT, Morf  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > >Phil wrote:   
   > > >>   
   > > >> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:47:39 GMT, Morf  wrote:   
   > > >>   
   > > >> >rms1 wrote:   
   > > >> >>   
   > > >> >> "DJ"  wrote in message   
   > > >> >> news:20031212091247.08340.00000734@mb-m02.aol.com...   
   > > >> >> >                       Cincinnati NAACP Investigates Homicidal   
   Police   
   > > >> >> Beating   
   > > >> >>   
   > > >> >> Big deal.  That doesn't mean the cops didn't utilize proper   
   procedures.  It   
   > > >> >> doesn't mean the investigation is worthwhile.  Just because the   
   NAACP is   
   > > >> >> involved doesn't make the police wrong, in any way, necessarily.  We   
   should   
   > > >> >> remember this, and ignore the rhetoric.   
   > > >> >   
   > > >> >   
   > > >> >Allowing the killers to judge themselves is your insane idea?   
   > > >> >   
   > > >> >Killing the innocent is terrorism.   
   > > >> >   
   > > >> >No trial = not guilty, always.   
   > > >> >   
   > > >> >Guilt isn't assumed, ever.   
   > > >> >   
   > > >> >Guilt requires a trial and a verdict.   
   > > >>   
   > > >> But you're willing to call cops killers, right?   
   > > >   
   > > >Yes, if they kill.   
   > > >   
   > > >>  Without a trial?   
   > > >   
   > > >Yes, they are killers if they kill.   
   > > >   
   > > >> Without a guilty verdict?   
   > > >   
   > > >A guilty verdict makes you guilty of a crime.   
   > > >   
   > > >The jury decided who lives or dies as stated by the Feds ruling that   
   > > >only juries can   
   > > >sentence a person to death.   
   > > >   
   > > >> Your hypocracy is showing.   
   > > >   
   > > >Drinking causes spelling errors.   
   > >   
   > > I point out a major flaw in your argument and you reply by pointing   
   > > out a misspelling?  Pathetic!   
   > >   
   > > How can you say a person is innocent until proven guilty, unless he or   
   > > she is a cop?   
   > >   
   > > By your own pathetic argument, then, Hitler is an innocent man.   
   > >   
   > > So is Hussein.   
   >   
   > So is George W. Bush.   
      
      
   Bush wouldn't be allowed in Canada if he weren't President because of   
   his conviction for DUI.   
      
   His conviction makes him a convict.   
      
   > --   
   > "Bubba got a blowjob, BU$H fucked us all!" - Slim   
   >   
   > George "The AWOL President" Bush: http://awol.gq.nu/4dawol.htm   
   >   
   > WHY IRAQ?: http://www.angelfire.com/creep/gwbush/remindus.html   
   >   
   > VOTE HIM OUT! November 4, 2004   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)