From: rrufiange@cfl.rr.com   
      
   "rl"  wrote in message   
   news:_XKDb.57018$cQ.3534@okepread05...   
   > I guess it boils down to how you view the intent behind the video.   
      
   Funny, the administration didn't elaborate on that when they condemned   
   Saddam and his troops the first time.  I wonder why?   
      
   > I see a big difference between parading handcuffed, unarmed POWs in front   
   of   
   > their captors so they can be humiliated and taunted and showing Saddam   
   being   
   > afforded humane treatment and basic health care.   
      
   What was the purpose of showing Saddam being picked for headlice and swabbed   
   in his mouth for whatever reason?  They could have just as easily waited   
   afterwards, or filmed him beforehand.  It implies vulnerability.   
      
   > But then, I'm sure that there are some out there who would choose to   
   > question any/every step we take as a nation.   
      
   It's a right we have under the Constitution.  The right to question our   
   government's actions and choices.  You should look into that sometime.   
      
   > Some of them still can't get over the Florida thing.  They just can't   
   figure   
   > out why we followed the guidelines set forth by the Constitution.   
      
   Any special reason why you brought up Florida?  I sure didn't.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)