XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.conspiracy, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: roger@   
      
   In one age, called the Second Age by some,   
      (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)   
         someone claiming to be Seneca wrote   
            in message :   
      
   >"Philip Mathews"  wrote in message   
   >news:pwlEb.392401$Dw6.1244435@attbi_s02...   
      
   >> "Seneca"  wrote in message   
   >> news:hgkEb.37647$D36.34360@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com...   
      
   >> > Yes. Except of course when the Nazis were being fiendishly clever,   
   >> > inventing   
   >> > conveyor belts and submerging metal plates for electrocuting Jews,   
   >> > modifying   
   >> > a pesticide so that it could be used to efficiently kill millions of   
   >> > Jews,   
      
   >> Of course no historian has ever said they did, [ . . . ]   
      
   >Of course any "historian" who says they did immediately becomes a   
   >non-historian as soon as the fiction is exposed, unless he does a quick   
   >back-shuffle and modifies the story to suit.   
      
   If any historian had stated the electrocution as fact, then you are   
   correct.   
      
   That's because it's provably not true, and that's the way history   
   works.   
      
   You have a problem of some sort with this process?   
      
   Of course,. this is also why those who claim that the Holocaust never   
   happened are not historians:  they lie about the evidence to further   
   an ideologically motivated untruth.   
      
   >Thus four million becomes one million,   
      
   Yes -- the museum at Auschwitz corrected their error -- one which no   
   historian in the West ever took at face value anyway.  But it was   
   historicity, not "revisionism" which resulted in this change.   
      
   >Jewish-corpse soap vanishes "poof!" into thin air,   
      
   How can something vanish which has always provably been a rumour based   
   in fact?   
      
   >and so on. This "history" is a constantly evolving one, it seems.   
      
   The details of *any* historical event change as new evidence becomes   
   available.  Yet this is only nefarious when the Jews are involved --   
   and only because deniers like "mark" pretend that history is set in   
   stone from the moment the very first history book mentions a given   
   subject.   
      
   Nor can "mark" demonstrate how any of these details has any impact on   
   the larger picture:  that being the wholesale murder of millions of   
   non-combatant victims as a policy of the Nazi Government (roughly half   
   for the "crime" of being perceived to be Jewish) and approved at it's   
   highest levels, by a variety of means including mass shootings and   
   homicidal gas chambers.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)