XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.conspiracy, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: smock@nizkor.org   
      
   "Seneca"  wrote in   
   news:KfEEb.43187$Wg7.1123@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com:   
      
   > "Steven Mock"  wrote in message   
   > news:Xns9455BC0942D23smocknizkororg@140.99.99.130...   
   >> "Seneca"  wrote in   
   >> news:bMlEb.42799$tW2.9753@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com:   
   >>   
   >> > Of course any "historian" who says they did immediately becomes a   
   >> > non-historian as soon as the fiction is exposed, unless he does a   
   >> > quick back-shuffle and modifies the story to suit. Thus four   
   >> > million becomes one million, Jewish-corpse soap vanishes "poof!"   
   >> > into thin air, and so on. This "history" is a constantly evolving   
   >> > one, it seems.   
   >>   
   >> Kind of like any history that evolves as more accurate information   
   >> comes to light.  How, exactly, is Holocaust history any different?   
   >>   
   >> Are you going to contribute to the process, or just sit on the   
   >> sidelines and sneer.   
   >>   
   >> Steven Mock   
   >   
   > I have been contributing to the process, Mock. That you don't like the   
   > way it is developing is not a problem of mine.   
      
   What, exactly, have you contributed, Seneca?  Why don't you cite even   
   one instance in which you have brought to light evidence or information   
   that seriously challenges the historical record?   
      
   > Enough with this going around and around in the same worn-out groove.   
   > I declare this argument over, and Seneca the clear winner.   
      
   LOL!  I see Seneca has discovered the only tried and true method by   
   which a revisionist ever won a debate.   
      
   Steven Mock   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)