Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.prisons    |    Not always a Johnny Cash song    |    3,649 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,329 of 3,649    |
|    Peter H. Proctor to All    |
|    Re: "Life on death row is unbearable due    |
|    19 Dec 03 12:16:57    |
      XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa       XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican       XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement       From: drp@drproctor.com              On 19 Dec 2003 04:21:57 -0800, shrbw@abertay.ac.uk (Barry Worthington)       wrote:              >We make mistakes too - that's why we don't execute people any more.       >       >We leave that to less civilised places like Texas....              We generally don't execute innocents here in Texas. But I was       personally-involved in a near thing, as follows====               The night before, the accused was observed having dispute with       victim, who was found shot dead the next morning. In the victim's       clenched fingers is a hair from a white persons ( Both the victim and       accused were afro-american ).               Accused is convicted of murder in the first trial and       sentenced to death. On appeal, he gets a new trial.               I get called in as a defense expert to testify the hair was from       a caucasian. When I finally look at it, it was obviously broken in       some traumatic event.               I always ask to look at the coroner's report, since I did a       pathology residency. In contradiction to the states theory that       the murder happened 12 hours before, the physical findings clearly       show the victim could only have been killed an hour or so before the       body was discovered, a which time, the accussed had a good alibi.               There is reason to think the prosecution knew this. E.g., Most       unusually, the Medical examiner was not called to testify at the       first trial. The suspicion is that this was because he would have       had to testify to the real time of death, if the defense attorney       figured it out...               Anyway, the second jury comes thru with a "not guilty" verdict.       All this due to enough chance happenings that I wonder what does not       get cleared up....              Dr P              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca