XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: rsweeney1@comcast.net   
      
   "ulTRAX" wrote in message   
   news:3513d8b1.0312122057.6d712b56@posting.google.com...   
   > Eric Johnson wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > On 27-11-2003 00:02, in article   
   > > 3513d8b1.0311261502.5e8dc3f5@posting.google.com, "ulTRAX"   
   > > wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > The   
   > > > People saw Bush and rejected him and his policies. Yet Election 2000   
   > > > IMPOSED Bush, radical Rightist, on what are supposed to be a free   
   > > > people.   
   > >   
   > > In your opinion. Bush won more EC votes than Gore.   
   > >   
   > > There is no popular vote for president in America.   
   > >   
   > > Put away your calculator, for there is no such feature in American   
   > > Presidential politics which talks about the total number of votes nation   
   > > wide.   
   > >   
   > > We are sorry, but it simply does not work the way you suggest.   
   >   
   > TRANSLATION: The US Constitution is anti-democratic... therefore fails   
   > the test of moral legitimacy prescribed in the Declaration of   
   > Independence. If this anti-democratic formula helps the RR'tards on   
   > the Right impose their 1st century Christian psychosis on a 21st   
   > century nation... then it's morally legitimate.   
      
   Original meaning doesn't require translation...   
      
   The president is elected to serve all the regions of the country, not just   
   those with the highest populations.   
      
   Quite a decent design by the founders, it prevented NY and the left coast   
   from electing liberal democrat Al Gore, who lost virtually every state in   
   between.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|