XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa
XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican
XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement
From: s@krulick.com
Rockfest70 wrote:
>
> "Scout" wrote in message news:...
> > "ulTRAX" wrote in message
> > news:3513d8b1.0312160909.5b62f4ee@posting.google.com...
> > > "Scout" wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > "Guido Marx" wrote in message
> > > > news:3d9f92bf.0312151638.5d09509b@posting.google.com...
> > > > > Any country run by simple majority vote will be indistinguishable
from
> > > > > a totalitarian dictatorship.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, but Guido, that's what he wants. His posting history makes that
> > quite
> > > > clear.
> > >
> > > Are you really as unintelligent as you sound? Or is there some
> > > untreated psychosis acting up again? Why else would you constantly
> > > treat reality as Silly Putty?
> > >
> > > Please show where I EVER called for a totalitarian dictatorship of the
> > > majority or that minorities NOT be protected.
> >
> > So you admit that you prefer the minority to have more authority than that
> > of the majority.
>
> I'm sorry Scout... but you really are an insufferable idiot. As I said
> before you are incapable of absorbing new information you find
> threatening. SO you have to warp reality to make it comfortable
>
> I have REPEATEDLY said that I favor morally legitimate MAJORITY
> government and that the proper way to protect minorities is though
> laws that protect their rights... NOT to grant minorities more power
> though an anti-democratic vote weighing scheme.... especially one that
> can lead to minority rule.
>
> How does this formula in ANY way suggest "the minority to have more
> authority than that of the majority"?
It doesn't. You've merely been the target of another of Sorry
Snout's famous Snoutisms!
Snoutism (R)!
A classic example of Silly Snout's bogus strawmen, that always
follows the same logic-impaired pattern.
How you KNOW a Snoutism is coming: instead of letting someone
make one's own argument in one's own words, it's "according to
you," or "So, what you're saying is"! Snout is hilarious! Look
as some examples of typical Snoutisms:
(They all go like this: "I see, so when you say [false
misinterpretation], you [negative of something claimed to have
been, but never was, said]"! I have a dozen of them!)
I now have one more to add to the list!:
> > Oh, then the law is NOT the law. Interesting.
> > I see, and the Nazi SS were innocent because they were only
> > following orders.
> > A red car drove by, the people were having a wonderful party.
> > Thus by the logic of Rich, people are red cars, because those
> > are the opening words.
> > Oh, then "the people" does NOT refer to those in the militia?
> > Finally, exactly what part of the Constitution would I find the Miller
case?
> > Does the Constitution recognize a blue sky? Does that keep us from having
> > one?
> > I see, so the Constitution does NOT mean what it says?
> > Explain to me.....exactly what sort of "collective" was Mr. Miller?
> > I see, so the 4th Amendment only applies with white males?
> > Thus the 4th Amendment protects no individuals since it recognizes only
"the
> > right of the people".....
> > the people can assembly ONLY when the ENTIRE
> > collective does so.
> > So that means the rest of the Constitution is just as meaningless?????
> > After all, as you pointed out they are dead....and they wrote the rest of
> > the document as well.
> > that the 4th Amendment does NOT apply to
> > individuals because the 4th Amendment addresses "The right of the people"
> > which according to you is something that would apply only to a COLLECTIVE?
> > So you are attempting to assert that there are no able bodied males in the
> > USA?
> > So you admit that you prefer the minority to have more authority than that
> > of the majority.
--
Steven Krulick / s@krulick.com
Ellenville NY 12428-130727
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
