From: rrufiange@cfl.rr.com   
      
   "Dissident"  wrote in message   
   news:3FE8272C.5030101@7600.net...   
   > Oh, and, "Michael the pedophile"?  Has he been tried and   
   > convicted yet?  Don't you get a little bothered when anti-CO   
   > types label an officer who has merely been accused of excess   
   > force as "the inmate murdering CO", before he ever goes to   
   > trial?  If not, you should.  Charges don't mean guilt, whether   
   > you're a cop or a pop star.   
      
   Don't know about Nadacomin, but I call him a PEDOPHILE because he paid off   
   the family to drop the lawsuit, in the previous case.  People already knew   
   what he was charged with, so it would have served his position better, it   
   seems, to fight it in court and prove himself to be innocent.  The only   
   logic here would apparently indicate he couldn't prove his innocence, and   
   thus didn't want to go to prison for molesting a child.   
      
   Paying off the "victim" after the world already hears you molest kids is   
   rather desperate.  I'm surprised his legal team allowed it without   
   explaining to him that he'd still look guilty to anyone with half a brain or   
   better.   
      
   Maybe he thinks his fans won't notice, or won't remember.  The same fans he   
   embraces now to help prove he's innocent of these charges.  My mom USED to   
   be one of those fans.  I wonder how many more are opening their eyes.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)