From: ron.sam{please-remove}@cox.net   
      
   "Pavel Brown"  wrote in message   
   news:expatriate3925-FCEE0D.20144222122003@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...   
   > In article <20031221203513.04365.00001363@mb-m29.aol.com>,   
   >  mywingsofanangel@aol.com (MyWingsofanangel) wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > > >professional (from Websters)   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >adjective:   
   > > >   
   > > >Of or pertaining to a profession, or calling; conforming to the rules   
   or   
   > > >standards of a profession; following a profession; as, professional   
   > > >knowledge; professional conduct. Not personal, but professional.   
   > > >   
   > > >n. A person who prosecutes anything professionally, or for a   
   livelihood,   
   > > >and not in the character of an amateur;   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >Again.....   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >* CONFORMING TO THE RULES OR STANDARDS OF A PROFESSION.   
   > > >   
   > > >* PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE. NOT PERSONAL.   
   > > >   
   > > >* NOT IN THE CHARACTER OF AN AMATEUR.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >P.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > Heck, I am sure we all, con and guard alike, know there are good and bad   
   > > wardens (i.e.administrations)  Funny thing to me, is most guards   
   buy   
   > > into   
   > > whatever administration they have fallen into without a whimper. Cons   
   have   
   > > no choice unless it is an uprising.   
   > >   
   > > MAX   
   >   
   >   
   > Yes... very true. Which concerns me greatly when the guard climate turns   
   > ugly.   
   >   
   > P.   
      
   Thought you were so interested in the whole "professionalism" thingie?   
      
   The "guard" moniker went out long ago.   
      
   Watch out, your spots are starting to show.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)