XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.thebird.copwatch, nyc.general
XPost: alt.true-crime
From: central222@hotmail.com
frog wrote:
>
> "LaW Man" wrote in
> > Well, it seems we agree on this point. Thanks.
>
> I need a little help on this please. Is this how officers of the law
> are trained to deal with citizens who are mental patients?
Yes, even though they are likely NOT guilty.
Cops today are taught the presumption of guilt allowing immediate
execution
of mentally ill persons.
> I am not
> condemning all officers of the law with my posting of these articles.
> I am concerned, for one reason, because my younger sister is
> schizophrenic. So, therefore, I do have experience on these matters. I
> have never had to use deadly force on her to protect her, myself or
> anyone else (yes there have been irrational moments of danger). Are
> some officers who choose to use deadly force allowed to be judge,
> jury, and executioner, so to speak?
Cops consider themselves to be Gods.
> It seems to me it is highly
> possible too unarm a citizen of a knife with a baton bat to the wrist,
> etc. How do officers of the law go from initiating a taser subduction
> to two fatal shots in the chest, avoiding attacking the shoulders
> first and then the legs? This officer has but 2 1/2 years experience.
> Does anyone think this may have been a factor?
> I end up with more questions than answers on this. Again I am not here
> to condemmn all officers of the law, but I am allowed to question some
> of their actions. Any response is greatly appreciated. -frog
John Hinckley shot the President.
He was also found to be not guilty.
The right to a quick and speedy trial has been replaced with the right
to
be executed by cops who get to decide who deserves to die.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
