home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.prisons      Not always a Johnny Cash song      3,649 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,525 of 3,649   
   Morf to jaybird   
   Re: Police killed son needlessly, mother   
   25 Dec 03 09:16:37   
   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.thebird.copwatch, nyc.general   
   XPost: alt.true-crime   
   From: central222@hotmail.com   
      
   jaybird wrote:   
   >   
   > "Morf"  wrote in message   
   > news:3FE9CCB9.5BCF@hotmail.com...   
   > > jaybird wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > "frog"  wrote in message   
   > > > news:3c0a3d12.0312211007.30c8cd86@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > "LaW Man"  wrote in   
   > > > > > Well, it seems we agree on this point. Thanks.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > I need a little help on this please.  Is this how officers of the law   
   > > > > are trained to deal with citizens who are mental patients?  I am not   
   > > > > condemning all officers of the law with my posting of these articles.   
   > > > > I am concerned, for one reason, because my younger sister is   
   > > > > schizophrenic. So, therefore, I do have experience on these matters. I   
   > > > > have never had to use deadly force on her to protect her, myself or   
   > > > > anyone else (yes there have been irrational moments of danger).  Are   
   > > > > some officers who choose to use deadly force allowed to be judge,   
   > > > > jury, and executioner, so to speak?  It seems to me it is highly   
   > > > > possible too unarm a citizen of a knife with a baton bat to the wrist,   
   > > > > etc.  How do officers of the law go from initiating a taser subduction   
   > > > > to two fatal shots in the chest, avoiding attacking the shoulders   
   > > > > first and then the legs? This officer has but 2 1/2 years experience.   
   > > > > Does anyone think this may have been a factor?   
   > > > > I end up with more questions than answers on this. Again I am not here   
   > > > > to condemmn all officers of the law, but I am allowed to question some   
   > > > > of their actions. Any response is greatly appreciated.   -frog   
   > > >   
   > > > Yes, it is how they are trained to deal with anyone in this situation   
   > > > regardless of their mental state.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > You would kill your own child if he refused to drop a knife?   
   > >   
   > > You, in fact, wouldn't kill "anyone" that refused to drop a knife.   
   > >   
   > > Only undesirables.   
   >   
   > My own child as a threat would be different to me because of the knowledge   
   > that I have of his or her past behavior.  Cops coming into a new situation   
   > don't have that luxury.   
      
   In the ghetto you would just blow someone else's kid away, though.   
      
   Imported cops kill instantaneously when away from their own   
   neighborhood.   
      
   > > >You don't have to look any further for   
   > > > your answers than the law books for your state.  There it will tell you   
   > what   
   > > > level of force is permissable by anyone, not just cops.  If a person has   
   > a   
   > > > knife and they are threatening imminent serious bodily injury or death,   
   > then   
   > > > any person can use deadly force against that person regardless of their   
   > > > mental state.   
   > >   
   > > Unless the threatening person is a cop pointing a gun at you and you   
   > > have committed no crime.   
   > >   
   > > A citizen is not allowed to percieve a threat by a cop(God) as a threat.   
   > >   
   > > > From the movies it may appear that it's easy to knock a knife   
   > > > from someone's hand with a baton, but it's not that way in real life.   
   > >   
   > > Mental patients are disarmed every day by non-cops.   
   >   
   > That's fine.  Cops are not those non-cops.   
      
   True, cops are inferior and homicidal compared to medical professionals.   
      
   > > > A   
   > > > knife can be met by a gun according to the law.  The cops used a taser,   
   > that   
   > > > didn't work, so the next level of force is a firearm to stop that   
   > threat.   
   > > > They were being generous in using the taser in the first place.   
   > >   
   > > Hitler acted within his laws too.   
   >   
   > Yes, but they were his own.  Our laws are made from the majority of our   
   > citizenry.   
      
      
   Never happened. The majority of the citizens never voted in their lives.   
      
   Bush and Gore got 50 million votes in the last election   
      
   50 million voters is only 16.66...% of the citizenry.   
      
   16.66...% is not even close to a majority.   
      
   16.66...% demand the other 83% obey them.   
      
   US laws being based on the wishes of the majority is a masturbatory   
   fantasy.   
      
   66% of the citizens don't vote.   
      
   They are the clear-cut majority.   
      
   > ---   
   > jaybird   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca