XPost: alt.activism.death-penalty, talk.politics, alt.law-enforcement   
   XPost: alt.true-crime   
   From: abcxyz@zbqytr.ykq   
      
   On 22 Dec 2003 14:02:44 -0800, nanleecro@hotmail.com (nan) wrote:   
      
   >Pavel Brown  wrote in message new   
   :...   
   >> In article <8f49fa86.0312211507.34dd3e77@posting.google.com>,   
   >>  nanleecro@hotmail.com (nan) wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > I have trouble with the concept of "ammorality", and I am reminded of   
   >> > this:   
   >> >   
   >> > "A sociopath with no restraints can become anything... Ammorality   
   >> > frees her to be universally perfect, a charming chameleon with a   
   >> > scorpion's tail..." -- Color of Night   
   >> >   
   >> > Happy Holidays, from Nan   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Sociopaths can rarely be identified much less restrained Nan. Most never   
   >> commit a crime... food for thought.   
   >>   
   >Dear Pavel,   
   >I knew you didn't typo "amorality", but I just don't have a sense of   
   >what "ammorality" means in part and in total because it is a "new   
   >concept" and is not a classic or traditional concept. If you deny to   
   >yourself that there is no personal morality (Ethos), from where and   
   >how does your assuming "ammorality" begin?   
   >   
   >It appears among some thinkers that "ammorality" is mere rationality,   
   >not formed from Reason.  Since "ammorality" wants not to be the   
   >antithesis of either immorality or morality, what are its exalted   
   >precepts - it's idealism?   
   >   
   >Have you written there is no right and no wrong in a post to Planet   
   >Visitor?   
      
   No.. he did not say it exactly as that.  I believe he is not arguing that   
   others may not see a 'right' or 'wrong,' to various acts that humans   
   commit... he just doesn't feel he possesses the faculties to cogitate in his   
   own mind if he finds any of those acts 'right' or 'wrong.'  Like 'little Bo   
   Peep,' who 'lost her sheep,' his words were "Right and wrong? Yes...   
   I have lost the sense of "right and wrong." "  I cannot help but believe   
   that tends to place us lower down the evolutionary scale than where we   
   should rightfully be.  A 'step backwards,' rather than a 'step forward,'   
   in the evolutionary process.   
      
   However --  he seems quite willing to claim he KNOWS what is "productive,"   
   "acceptable," "responsible," and "healthy," he just doesn't know if it   
   is "right" to BE "productive," "acceptable," "responsibility," or "healthy."   
      
      
   >   
   >We are surging here in NH and just when I get into this long thread or   
   >start a post, the elec. blinks out - then flickers off and on.   
      
   Ah ha... that sounds 'unproductive,' and 'unacceptable' to me...   
   and I'd be willing to go out on a limb... and even say it doesn't   
   seem 'right' to me.  :-)   
      
   PV   
   http://home.earthlink.net/~onetimeuse/desmond_gimmick_index.html   
   >   
   >HH from Nan   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)