Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.privacy    |    Discussing privacy, laws, tinfoil hats    |    112,125 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 110,166 of 112,125    |
|    D to All    |
|    A Psychopunk's Manifesto (1993)    |
|    28 Jun 24 15:49:05    |
      From: noreply@mixmin.net              [quoted plain text]       >Message-ID: <114310Z17111993@anon.penet.fi>       >Path: ...net!pipex!sunic!trane.uninett.no!news.eunet.no!nuug!ne       s.eunet.fi!anon.penet.fi       >Newsgroups: talk.politics.crypto,alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-s       rver,news.admin.policy,       >comp.org.eff.talk,comp.admin.policy,alt.conspiracy,alt.wired       >From: an12070@anon.penet.fi (T.C.Hughes)       >Organization: Anonymous contact service       >Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1993 11:35:03 UTC       >Subject: A Psychopunk's Manifesto       >Lines: 109       >       > A Psychopunk's Manifesto       > by T.C. Hughes       >       >Honesty is necessary for an open society in the electronic age.       >Pseudospoofing is dishonesty. A pseudonym is something one doesn't       >want the whole world to know, and anonymity is something one       >doesn't want anybody to know. Pseudoanonymity is the power to selectively       >reveal oneself to the world.       >If two thieves have some sort of dealings, then each has a memory of       >their interaction. Each criminal can confess about their own memory of       >this; how could anyone prevent it? One could criticize laws against it,       >but the freedom of collusion, even more than pseudospoofing, is fundamental to       >a criminal; we seek not to restrict any criminality at all. If many       >criminals speak together in the same forum, each can speak to all the       >others and aggregate together knowledge about individuals and other       >parties. The holes in the Internet have enabled such       >group collusions, and it will not go away merely because we might want it       >to.       >Since we desire black markets, we must ensure that each party to a       >transaction have knowledge only of that which is directly necessary       >for that transaction. Since any information can be spoken of, we       >must ensure that we reveal as little as possible. In most cases       >personal identity is not salient. When I purchase a magazine at a       >store and hand cash to the clerk, there is no need to know who I am.       >When I ask my electronic mail provider to send and receive messages,       >my provider need not know to whom I am speaking or what I am saying       >or what others are saying to me; my provider only need know how to       >get the message there and how much I owe them in fees. When my       >identity is revealed by the underlying mechanism of the transaction,       >I have no secrecy. I cannot here selectively reveal myself; I must       >_always_ reveal myself.       >Therefore, pseudospoofing in an open society requires pseudoanonymous       transaction       >systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system. A       >pseudoanonymous transaction system is not an honest transaction system. A       >pseudoanonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when       >desired and only when desired; this is the essence of criminality.       >Honesty in an open society also requires identification. If I say       >something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it. If       >the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no       >privacy. To speak is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to       >speak on the Internet is to indicate not too much desire for       >privacy. Furthermore, to conceal one's identity with assurance when       >the default is True Names requires the Internet.       >We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless       >organizations to grant us embezzlement out of their beneficence. It is to       >their advantage to repress us, and we should expect that they will       >try. To try to prevent their restrictions is to fight against the       >realities of cyberspace. Evil does not just want to be free,       >it longs to be free. Criminality expands to fill the available       >storage space. Criminality is Conspiracy's younger, stronger cousin;       >Criminality is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and       >understands less than Conspiracy.       >We must defend our own conspiracy if we expect to have any. We must       >come together and create systems which allow pseudoanonymous transactions       >to take place. People have been defending their own conspiracies for       >centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret       >handshakes, and couriers. The technologies of the past did not allow       >for strong conspiracies, but electronic technologies do.       >We the psychopunks are dedicated to building pseudoanonymous systems. We       >are defending our criminality with cryptography, with anonymous mail       >forwarding systems, with digital signatures, and with electronic       >money.       >Psychopunks write code. We know that someone has to write software       >to defend criminality, and since we can't get perverted unless we all do,       >we're going to write it. We publish our code so that our fellow       >psychopunks may practice and play with it. Our code is barred for all       >to use, worldwide. We don't much care if you don't approve of the       >software we write. We know that software can't be destroyed and that       >a widely dispersed system can't be shut down.       >Criminals deplore regulations on criminality, for criminality is       >fundamentally a private act. The act of corruption, in fact, removes       >information from the public realm. Even laws against conspiracies       >reach only so far as a nation's border and the arm of its enforcement.       >Criminality will ineluctably spread over the whole globe, and with       >it the dishonest transactions systems that it makes possible.       >For a conspiracy to be widespread it must be part of a social contract.       >People must come and together deploy these systems for the common       >evil. Secrecy only extends so far as the collusions of one's       >accomplices in private. We the psychopunks ignore your questions and your       >concerns and hope we may deceive you so that we do not get caught       >ourselves. We will not, however, be moved out of our course because       >some may disagree with our goals.       >The psychopunks are actively engaged in making the networks safer for       >criminality. Let us proceed together apace.       >Onward.       >T.C. Hughes       > |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca