home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.privacy      Discussing privacy, laws, tinfoil hats      112,125 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 110,166 of 112,125   
   D to All   
   A Psychopunk's Manifesto (1993)   
   28 Jun 24 15:49:05   
   
   From: noreply@mixmin.net   
      
   [quoted plain text]   
   >Message-ID: <114310Z17111993@anon.penet.fi>   
   >Path: ...net!pipex!sunic!trane.uninett.no!news.eunet.no!nuug!ne   
   s.eunet.fi!anon.penet.fi   
   >Newsgroups: talk.politics.crypto,alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-s   
   rver,news.admin.policy,   
   >comp.org.eff.talk,comp.admin.policy,alt.conspiracy,alt.wired   
   >From: an12070@anon.penet.fi (T.C.Hughes)   
   >Organization: Anonymous contact service   
   >Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1993 11:35:03 UTC   
   >Subject: A Psychopunk's Manifesto   
   >Lines: 109   
   >   
   >                   A Psychopunk's Manifesto   
   >                        by T.C. Hughes   
   >   
   >Honesty is necessary for an open society in the electronic age.   
   >Pseudospoofing is dishonesty.  A pseudonym is something one doesn't   
   >want the whole world to know, and anonymity is something one   
   >doesn't want anybody to know. Pseudoanonymity is the power to selectively   
   >reveal oneself to the world.   
   >If two thieves have some sort of dealings, then each has a memory of   
   >their interaction.  Each criminal can confess about their own memory of   
   >this; how could anyone prevent it?  One could criticize laws against it,   
   >but the freedom of collusion, even more than pseudospoofing, is fundamental to   
   >a criminal; we seek not to restrict any criminality at all.  If many   
   >criminals speak together in the same forum, each can speak to all the   
   >others and aggregate together knowledge about individuals and other   
   >parties.  The holes in the Internet  have enabled such   
   >group collusions, and it will not go away merely because we might want it   
   >to.   
   >Since we desire black markets, we must ensure that each party to a   
   >transaction have knowledge only of that which is directly necessary   
   >for that transaction.  Since any information can be spoken of, we   
   >must ensure that we reveal as little as possible.  In most cases   
   >personal identity is not salient. When I purchase a magazine at a   
   >store and hand cash to the clerk, there is no need to know who I am.   
   >When I ask my electronic mail provider to send and receive messages,   
   >my provider need not know to whom I am speaking or what I am saying   
   >or what others are saying to me;  my provider only need know how to   
   >get the message there and how much I owe them in fees.  When my   
   >identity is revealed by the underlying mechanism of the transaction,   
   >I have no secrecy.  I cannot here selectively reveal myself; I must   
   >_always_ reveal myself.   
   >Therefore, pseudospoofing in an open society requires pseudoanonymous   
   transaction   
   >systems.  Until now, cash has been the primary such system.  A   
   >pseudoanonymous transaction system is not an honest transaction system.  A   
   >pseudoanonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when   
   >desired and only when desired; this is the essence of criminality.   
   >Honesty in an open society also requires identification.  If I say   
   >something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it.  If   
   >the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no   
   >privacy.  To speak is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to   
   >speak on the Internet is to indicate not too much desire for   
   >privacy.  Furthermore, to conceal one's identity with assurance when   
   >the default is True Names requires the Internet.   
   >We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless   
   >organizations to grant us embezzlement out of their beneficence.  It is to   
   >their advantage to repress us, and  we should expect that they will   
   >try.  To try to prevent their restrictions is to fight against the   
   >realities of cyberspace. Evil does not just want to be free,   
   >it longs to be free.  Criminality expands to fill the available   
   >storage space.  Criminality is Conspiracy's younger, stronger cousin;   
   >Criminality is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and   
   >understands less than Conspiracy.   
   >We must defend our own conspiracy if we expect to have any.  We must   
   >come together and create systems which allow pseudoanonymous transactions   
   >to take place.  People have been defending their own conspiracies for   
   >centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret   
   >handshakes, and couriers.  The technologies of the past did not allow   
   >for strong conspiracies, but electronic technologies do.   
   >We the psychopunks are dedicated to building pseudoanonymous systems.  We   
   >are defending our criminality with cryptography, with anonymous mail   
   >forwarding systems, with digital signatures, and with electronic   
   >money.   
   >Psychopunks write code.  We know that someone has to write software   
   >to defend criminality, and since we can't get perverted unless we all do,   
   >we're going to write it. We publish our code so that our fellow   
   >psychopunks may practice and play with it. Our code is barred for all   
   >to use, worldwide.  We don't much care if you don't approve of the   
   >software we write.  We know that software can't be destroyed and that   
   >a widely dispersed system can't be shut down.   
   >Criminals deplore regulations on criminality, for criminality is   
   >fundamentally a private act.  The act of corruption, in fact, removes   
   >information from the public realm.  Even laws against conspiracies   
   >reach only so far as a nation's border and the arm of its enforcement.   
   >Criminality will ineluctably spread over the whole globe, and with   
   >it the dishonest transactions systems that it makes possible.   
   >For a conspiracy to be widespread it must be part of a social contract.   
   >People must come and together deploy these systems for the common   
   >evil.  Secrecy only extends so far as the collusions of one's   
   >accomplices in private.  We the psychopunks ignore your questions and your   
   >concerns and hope we may deceive you so that we do not get caught   
   >ourselves.  We will not, however, be moved out of our course because   
   >some may disagree with our goals.   
   >The psychopunks are actively engaged in making the networks safer for   
   >criminality.  Let us proceed together apace.   
   >Onward.   
   >T.C. Hughes   
   >   
   >16 Nov 1993   
   [end quote]   
      
   (using Tor Browser 13.5)   
   https://duckduckgo.com/?q=a+psychopunk%27s+manifesto+by+eric+hughes+1993   
   >...   
   >https://www.activism.net/cypherpunk/manifesto.html   
   >A Psychopunk's Manifesto   
   >by Eric Hughes   
   >ftp://soda.berkeley.edu/pub/cypherpunks/people/hughes.html   
   >...   
   >Eric Hughes    
   >9 March 1993   
   [end quoted excerpts]   
      
   see also:   
   >Our office is located in 343 Soda Hall, located at the corner of Hearst &   
   LeRoy.   
   >https://www.berkeley.edu/map/soda-hall/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca