Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.privacy    |    Discussing privacy, laws, tinfoil hats    |    112,125 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 110,359 of 112,125    |
|    SEC3 to karl@bogus.net    |
|    Re: Question about Tor and it's 'onion'     |
|    10 Jul 24 23:45:28    |
      XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server       From: admin@sec3.net              On 7/10/24 18:29, karl@bogus.net wrote:       > Why does this onion choice supposedly make Tor more secure? If a Tor       > relay point can be compromised, cannot an onion relay also? Does not       > this onion double the work of having to keep check on two types of       > relays instead of only the Tor relay network?       >       > I don't understand the necessity of this onion thing.              It's a user's choice whether they want to inject their remailer message       into the remailer network via a Tor hidden service like Mixmin's              3fd6guyxldqnjaqtfzejnjvq6bj7ilv5u7g7ovbubhwoeqhc222zvrad.onion:25              or whether they want to inject it directly via the SMTP server of the       entry remailer, say fleegle.mixmin.net:25              The former method hides your IP address from the the entry remailer.              The later method reveals your IP address to the entry remailer.                     --       SEC3              YAMN Help Tutorial - https://www.sec3.net/yamnhelp/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca