XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: andrew@spam.net   
      
   Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 15:41:59 GMT :   
      
   > Nothing you can say will change the fact that a greater-than-zero number   
   > of people have been convicted from CSAM scanning - just like nothing you   
   > can say will convince me that CSAM scanning can be done without   
   > violating the privacy of innocent people. Things like this should not   
   > happen:   
      
   I'm not disagreeing with you, Jolly Roger.   
   The CSAM scanning is a violating of privacy.   
      
   The question isn't that it's a violation of privacy.   
   The question is whether it's worth that violation of privacy.   
      
   For that assessment, we need to know what the conviction rate is.   
   Why do YOU think the reports all left out the most important fact?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)