XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: jollyroger@pobox.com   
      
   On 2024-07-25, Andrew  wrote:   
   > Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 19:22:24 GMT :   
   >   
   >>>> You're simply guessing. I'm using logic.  They're different logical   
   >>>> algorithms.   
   >>>   
   >>> Nope. You're guessing just as much as JR.   
   >>>   
   >>> The facts - and we know you like them, but never look for them - are   
   >>> that there are many convictions on a depressingly regular basis.   
   >>> Just look at the press releases from the DoJ Project Safe Childhood:   
   >>> https://www.justice.gov/psc/press-room   
   >>   
   >> My statements aren't guesses. There have been plenty of convictions.   
   >>   
   >> Unfortunately, there have also been privacy violations of innocent   
   >> people. And that's my primary concern when it comes to CSAM scanning.   
   >   
   > The cite Chris listed said NOTHING whatsoever about the conviction   
   > rate.   
      
   It certainly shows the conviction rate is higher than your claimed   
   "absolute zero". So it seems it was you who lied first. I realize you   
   want us to ignore this, but your focus on who lied demands we recognize   
   it.   
      
   --   
   E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.   
   I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.   
      
   JR   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)