XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: jollyroger@pobox.com   
      
   On 2024-07-25, Andrew  wrote:   
   > Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 15:41:59 GMT :   
   >   
   >> Nothing you can say will change the fact that a greater-than-zero number   
   >> of people have been convicted from CSAM scanning - just like nothing you   
   >> can say will convince me that CSAM scanning can be done without   
   >> violating the privacy of innocent people. Things like this should not   
   >> happen:   
   >   
   > I'm not disagreeing with you, Jolly Roger.   
   > The CSAM scanning is a violating of privacy.   
   >   
   > The question isn't that it's a violation of privacy.   
   > The question is whether it's worth that violation of privacy.   
      
   Ask the innocent people who have their privacy violated whether it was   
   worth it, and see what they tell you.   
      
   --   
   E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.   
   I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.   
      
   JR   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)