XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: andrew@spam.net   
      
   Chris wrote on Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:23:16 +0100 :   
      
   >> Chris just lied about convictions.   
   >> Why did Chris lie?   
   >   
   > Given I was responding to your claim of "ZERO convictions"...   
      
   Do you realize the number of convictions was never in dispute, Chris?   
      
   What is in dispute is your claims that Apple/Google/Facebook CSAM scanning   
   has a 100% conviction rate (which is essentially your claim, Chris).   
      
   I realize your mind forms strong belief systems based on exactly zero   
   facts, Chris - but the way most normal people work is they use facts.   
      
   Without knowing what the conviction rate is per report by   
   Google/Apple/Facebook, we have to assume that it's zero percent.   
      
   No other logical assessment is possible (by an actual adult).   
      
   And since that's the most important metric, the fact that it's purposefully   
   left out of the reports is an indication that it's probably zero percent.   
      
   Because the people writing those reports are not stupid.   
   They *know* the only metric isn't convictions - but conviction rates.   
      
   You haven't shown a single fact telling us the conviction rate out of the   
   millions (perhaps billions) of CSAM reports by Apple/Google/Facebook.   
      
   Your entire strongly held belief system is based on exactly zero facts.   
   You simply guessed that all those convictions are due to Apple/Google/FB.   
      
   And, as always, you guess wrong(ly).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)